Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846830›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2021

A systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with an implanted vagus nerve stimulation system.

S Fetzer, M Dibué, A M Nagel, R Trollmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Clinical experience implanting a miniature externally powered vagus nerve stimulator.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S FetzerMedical Affairs Europe, Neuromodulation, LivaNova Deutschland GmbH, LivaNova PLC owned subsidiary, Lindberghstraße 25, 80939, Munich, Germany.
M DibuéMedical Affairs Europe, Neuromodulation, LivaNova Deutschland GmbH, LivaNova PLC owned subsidiary, Lindberghstraße 25, 80939, Munich, Germany.
A M NagelDivision of Experimental Radiology, Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
R TrollmannDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Loschgestr. 15, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. regina.trollmann@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6031-8537
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an effective adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and difficult-to-treat depression (DTD). More than 125.000 patients have been implanted with VNS Therapy® System (LivaNova PLC) since initial approval. Patients with DRE often require magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain during the course of their disease. VNS Therapy System devices are labeled to allow MRI under certain conditions; however, there are no published comprehensive articles about the real-world experience using MRI in patients with implanted VNS devices.

methodsA systematic review in accordance with PRISMA statement was performed using PubMed database. Full-length articles reporting MRI (1.5 T or 3 T scanner) of patients with implanted VNS for DRE or DTD and published since 2000 were included. The primary endpoint was a positive outcome that was defined as a technically uneventful MRI scan performed in accordance with the VNS Therapy System manufacturer guidelines and completed according to the researchers' planned scanning protocol without harm to the patient.

resultsTwenty-six articles were eligible with 25 articles referring to the VNS Therapy System, and 216 patients were included in the analysis. No serious adverse events or serious device-related adverse events were reported. MRI scan was prematurely terminated in one patient due to a panic attack.

conclusionThis systematic review indicates that cranial MRI of patients with an implanted VNS Therapy System can be completed satisfactorily and is tolerable and safe using 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners when performed in adherence to the VNS manufacturer's guidelines.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyVagus Nerve StimulationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstheses and ImplantsTreatment OutcomeDepressionEpilepsyMRISide effectsVagus nerve stimulationVNS

Identifiers

PMID33846830
PMCPMC8376717
OpenAlexW3154431162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.