Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846631›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2021

Fabrication, characterization and applications of graphene electronic tattoos.

Dmitry Kireev, Shideh Kabiri Ameri, Alena Nederveld, Jameson Kampfe, Hongwoo Jang, Nanshu Lu, Deji Akinwande

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engineering two-dimensional electronic biosensors.Nature reviews electrical engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in 2D materials for wearable biomonitoring.Materials science & engineering. R, Reports : a review journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Atomically thin bioelectronics.Nature reviews. Materials · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dmitry KireevDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. kirdmitry@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1499-5435
Shideh Kabiri AmeriDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Alena NederveldDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Jameson KampfeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0446-4825
Hongwoo JangTexas Materials Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Nanshu LuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Deji AkinwandeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous fields of science and technology, including healthcare, robotics and bioelectronics, have begun to switch their research direction from developing 'high-end, high-cost' tools towards 'high-end, low-cost' solutions. Graphene electronic tattoos (GETs), whose fabrication protocol is discussed in this work, are ideal building blocks of future wearable technology due to their outstanding electromechanical properties. The GETs are composed of high-quality, large-scale graphene that is transferred onto tattoo paper, resulting in an electronic device that is applied onto skin like a temporary tattoo. Here, we provide a comprehensive GET fabrication protocol, starting from graphene growth and ending with integration onto human skin. The methodology presented is unique since it utilizes high-quality electronic-grade graphene, while the processing is done by using low-cost and off-the-shelf methods, such as a mechanical cutter plotter. The GETs can be either used in combination with advanced scientific equipment to perform precision experiments, or with low-cost electrophysiology boards, to conduct similar operations from home. In this protocol, we showcase how GETs can be applied onto the human body and how they can be used to obtain a variety of biopotentials, including electroencephalogram (brain waves), electrocardiogram (heart activity), electromyogram (muscle activity), as well as monitoring of body temperature and hydration. With graphene available from commercial sources, the whole protocol consumes ~3 h of labor and does not require highly trained personnel. The protocol described in this work can be readily replicated in simple laboratories, including high school facilities.

Indexed as

Electrical Equipment and SuppliesEquipment DesignGraphiteMechanical PhenomenaTattooingGraphite

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.