Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846587›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2022

Current practices regarding corporotomy localization during penoscrotal inflatable penile implant surgery: a multicenter cohort study.

Koenraad van Renterghem, Brecht Jacobs, Faysal Yafi, Daniar Osmonov, David Ralph, Luca Venturino, John Taylor Barnard, Matthew Ziegelmann, Run Wang, Chris Kannady and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. 50th year anniversary of penile implants: an ongoing worldwide triumph.International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Koenraad van RenterghemJessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Brecht JacobsJessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Faysal YafiUniversity of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7847-0246
Daniar OsmonovUniversitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4963-9158
David RalphUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-1182
Luca VenturinoUniversity College London, London, UK.
John Taylor BarnardUniversity of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-5879
Matthew ZiegelmannMayo Clinics, Rochester, MN, USA.
Run WangMemorial Hermann Texas Medical Centre, Houston, TX, USA.
Chris KannadyMemorial Hermann Texas Medical Centre, Houston, TX, USA.
Aaron LentzDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Enrique Lledo GarciaUniversity Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain.
Robert AndrianneCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Carlo BettochiUniversity of Bari, Bari, Italy.
George HatzichristodoulouDepartment of Urology, Martha-Maria Hospital, Nuremberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-7362
Martin GrossDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Centre, Lebanon, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-8642
Antoine FaixCentre Urologie Polygone, Montpellier, France.
Javier Romero OteroDepartment of Urology, Hospital Puerta De Hierro Majadahonda & Lyx Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0666-5105
Juan Ignacio Martinez SalamancaUniversity Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain.
Omidreza SedighUniversity of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Maarten AlbersenUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marij Dinkelman-SmitErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ioannis MykoniatisJessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium. g_mikoniatis@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3869-2888
Jessa Hospital · BEHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESMemorial Hermann–Texas Medical Center · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, Irvine · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BEDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USDuke University · USErasmus MC · NLMartha-Maria Hospital · DEMayo Clinic · USUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature concerning corporotomy location in multicomponent inflatable penile prosthetic surgery via a penoscrotal approach is scarce if not nonexistent. Aim of our study was to report practices in low-, moderate-, and high-volume penile implant centers regarding corporotomy location and evaluate its potential impact on intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications. Data from 18 (13 European and 5 American) implant centers were collected retrospectively between September 1st, 2018 and August 31st, 2019. Variables included: intraoperative proximal and distal corpus cavernosum length measurement, total corporal length measurement, total penile implant cylinder length, and length of rear tip extenders. Eight hundred and nine virgin penile implant cases were included in the analysis. Mean age of participants was 61.5 ± 9.6 years old. In total, 299 AMS 700™ (Boston Scientific, USA) and 510 Coloplast Titan® (Minneapolis, MN USA) devices were implanted. The mean proximal/distal corporal measurement ratio during corporotomy was 0.93 ± 0.29 while no statistical difference was found among low-, moderate-, and high-volume penile implant centers. A statistically significant correlation between lower proximal/distal measurement ratio and higher age (p = 0.0013), lower BMI (p < 0.0001), lower use of rear tip extenders (RTE) (p = 0.04), lower RTE length (p < 0.0001), and absence of diabetes (p = 0.0004) was reported. In a 3-month follow up period, 49 complications and 37 revision procedures were reported. This is the first study reporting the current practices regarding corporotomy location during IPP placement in a multicenter cohort, particularly when including such a high number of patients. Nevertheless, the retrospective design and the short follow up period limits the study outcomes. Corporotomy location during penoscrotal IPP implantation does not correlate with intraoperative or short-term postoperative complication rates. Future studies with longer follow up are needed in order to evaluate the association of corporotomy location with long-term complications.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPenisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33846587
OpenAlexW3154901329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.