Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846580›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2021

Genetic drift from the out-of-Africa bottleneck leads to biased estimation of genetic architecture and selection.

Bilal Ashraf, Daniel John Lawson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Fond farewell to clinical utility gene cards.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bilal AshrafDepartment of Statistical Sciences, School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Fry Building, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK.
Daniel John LawsonDepartment of Statistical Sciences, School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Fry Building, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK. dan.lawson@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5311-6213
Durham University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT104125MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most complex traits evolved in the ancestors of all modern humans and have been under negative or balancing selection to maintain the distribution of phenotypes observed today. Yet all large studies mapping genomes to complex traits occur in populations that have experienced the Out-of-Africa bottleneck. Does this bottleneck affect the way we characterise complex traits? We demonstrate using the 1000 Genomes dataset and hypothetical complex traits that genetic drift can strongly affect the joint distribution of effect size and SNP frequency, and that the bias can be positive or negative depending on subtle details. Characterisations that rely on this distribution therefore conflate genetic drift and selection. We provide a model to identify the underlying selection parameter in the presence of drift, and demonstrate that a simple sensitivity analysis may be enough to validate existing characterisations. We conclude that biobanks characterising more worldwide diversity would benefit studies of complex traits.

Indexed as

Genetic DriftHuman MigrationSelection, GeneticAfricaGene FrequencyHumansMultifactorial InheritancePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRacial Groups

Identifiers

PMID33846580
PMCPMC8484570
OpenAlexW3153695981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.