Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Introducing the tablet-based Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus (OCS-Plus) as an assessment tool for subtle cognitive impairments.

Nele Demeyere, Marleen Haupt, Sam S Webb, Lea Strobel, Elise T Milosevich, Margaret J Moore, Hayley Wright, Kathrin Finke, Mihaela D Duta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Post-stroke cognitive impairment: More than a lesion-symptom model.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Domain-specific cognitive impairment 6 months after stroke: The value of early cognitive screening.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nele DemeyereDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6AE, UK. nele.demeyere@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Marleen HauptDepartment of General and Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sam S WebbDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6AE, UK.
Lea StrobelDepartment of General and Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Elise T MilosevichDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6AE, UK.
Margaret J MooreDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6AE, UK.
Hayley WrightCoventry University, Coventry, UK.
Kathrin FinkeDepartment of General and Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Mihaela D DutaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, New Radcliffe House, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, OX2 6AE, UK.
University of Oxford · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DECoventry University · GBJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we present the Oxford Cognitive Screen-Plus, a computerised tablet-based screen designed to briefly assess domain-general cognition and provide more fine-grained measures of memory and executive function. The OCS-Plus was designed to sensitively screen for cognitive impairments and provide a differentiation between memory and executive deficits. The OCS-Plus contains 10 subtasks and requires on average 24 min to complete. In this study, 320 neurologically healthy ageing participants (age M = 62.66, SD = 13.75) from three sites completed the OCS-Plus. The convergent validity of this assessment was established in comparison to the ACE-R, CERAD and Rey-Osterrieth. Divergent validity was established through comparison with the BDI and tests measuring divergent cognitive domains. Internal consistency of each subtask was evaluated, and test-retest reliability was determined. We established the normative impairment cut-offs for each of the subtasks. Predicted convergent and divergent validity was found, high internal consistency for most measures was also found with the exception of restricted range tasks, as well as strong test-retest reliability, which provided evidence of test stability. Further research demonstrating the use and validity of the OCS-Plus in various clinical populations is required. The OCS-Plus is presented as a standardised cognitive assessment tool, normed and validated in a sample of neurologically healthy participants. The OCS-Plus will be available as an Android App and provides an automated report of domain-general cognitive impairments in executive attention and memory.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCognitive DysfunctionEducational StatusFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33846501
PMCPMC8041764
OpenAlexW3033200966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.