Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846484›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Comprehensive surgical treatment strategy for spinal metastases.

Arthur Wagner, Elena Haag, Ann-Kathrin Joerger, Philipp Jost, Stephanie E Combs, Maria Wostrack, Jens Gempt, Bernhard Meyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Regional variability and economic impact on surgical practices for metastatic spinal disease in Europe - a survey on spine surgeons.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur WagnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. arthur.wagner@tum.de.
Elena HaagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin JoergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Philipp JostDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Maria WostrackDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Jens GemptDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of patients with spinal metastases (SM) requires a multidisciplinary team of specialists involved in oncological care. Surgical management has evolved significantly over the recent years, which warrants reevaluation of its role in the oncological treatment concept. Any patient with a SM was screened for study inclusion. We report baseline characteristics, surgical procedures, complication rates, functional status and outcome of a large consecutive cohort undergoing surgical treatment according to an algorithm. 667 patients underwent 989 surgeries with a mean age of 65 years (min/max 20-94) between 2007 and 2018. The primary cancers mostly originated from the prostate (21.7%), breast (15.9%) and lung (10.0%). Surgical treatment consisted of dorsoventral stabilization in 69.5%, decompression without instrumentation in 12.5% and kyphoplasty in 18.0%. Overall survival reached 18.4 months (95% CI 9.8-26.9) and the median KPS increased by 10 within hospital stay. Surgical management of SMs should generally represent the first step of a conclusive treatment algorithm. The need to preserve long-term symptom control and biomechanical stability requires a surgical strategy currently not supported by level I evidence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CarePrognosisSpinal NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33846484
PMCPMC8042046
OpenAlexW3154046648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.