Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846433›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Hemostasis, coagulation and thrombin in venoarterial and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the HECTIC study.

Bruce Cartwright, Hannah M Bruce, Geoffrey Kershaw, Nancy Cai, Jad Othman, David Gattas, Jacqueline L Robson, Sarah Hayes, Hayden Alicajic, Anna Hines and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. National Heart Center Perfusion Guidelines.Saudi medical journal · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Anticoagulation in ECMO: Target Values to Reduce Hemorrhagic Complications in Adults. A Retrospective Cohort Study.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2025
    Article
  12. Lung rehabilitation using xenogeneic cross-circulation does not lead to hyperacute rejection in a human lung transplantation model.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Platelet Adhesion and Activation in an ECMO Thrombosis-on-a-Chip Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bruce CartwrightSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Hannah M BruceIntensive Care Service, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Geoffrey KershawDepartment of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Nancy CaiDepartment of Haematology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Jad OthmanDepartment of Haematology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
David GattasSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jacqueline L RobsonDepartment of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Sarah HayesIntensive Care Service, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Hayden AlicajicIntensive Care Service, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Anna HinesDepartment of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Alice WhyteDepartment of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Nophanan ChaikittisilpaDepartment of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Timothy James SouthwoodSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Paul ForrestSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Richard J TotaroSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Paul G BannonSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Scott DunkleySydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Vivien M ChenSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mark DennisSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. mark.dennis@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-1324
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has a high incidence of both bleeding and thrombotic complications. Despite clear differences in patient characteristics and pathologies between veno-venous (VV) and veno-arterial (VA) ECMO support, anticoagulation practices are often the same across modalities. Moreover, there is very little data on their respective coagulation profiles and comparisons of thrombin generation in these patients. This study compares the coagulation profile and thrombin generation between patients supported with either VV and VA ECMO. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing VA and VV ECMO at an Intensive care department of a university hospital and ECMO referral centre. In addition to routine coagulation testing and heparin monitoring per unit protocol, thromboelastography (TEG), multiplate aggregometry (MEA), calibrated automated thrombinography (CAT) and von-Willebrand's activity (antigen and activity ratio) were sampled second-daily for 1 week, then weekly thereafter. VA patients had significantly lower platelets counts, fibrinogen, anti-thrombin and clot strength with higher d-dimer levels than VV patients, consistent with a more pronounced consumptive coagulopathy. Thrombin generation was higher in VA than VV patients, and the heparin dose required to suppress thrombin generation was lower in VA patients. There were no significant differences in total bleeding or thrombotic event rates between VV and VA patients when adjusted for days on extracorporeal support. VA patients received a lower median daily heparin dose 8500 IU [IQR 2500-24000] versus VV 28,800 IU [IQR 17,300-40,800.00]; < 0.001. Twenty-eight patients (72%) survived to hospital discharge; comprising 53% of VA patients and 77% of VV patients. Significant differences between the coagulation profiles of VA and VV patients exist, and anticoagulation strategies for patients of these modalities should be different. Further research into the development of tailored anticoagulation strategies that include the mode of ECMO support need to be completed.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdultAnticoagulantsArteriesAutomationBlood CoagulationFactor XaFemaleHemorrhageHemostasisHeparinHumansMaleMiddle AgedPartial Thromboplastin TimeThrombelastographyAnticoagulantsFactor XaHeparinThrombin

Identifiers

PMID33846433
PMCPMC8042030
OpenAlexW3153477148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.