ArticleScientific reports2021
Optimized imaging methods for species-level identification of food-contaminating beetles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accurate species identification of food-contaminating beetles with quality-improved elytral images and deep learning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying the exact species of pantry beetle responsible for food contamination, is imperative in assessing the risks associated with contamination scenarios. Each beetle species is known to have unique patterns on their hardened forewings (known as elytra) through which they can be identified. Currently, this is done through manual microanalysis of the insect or their fragments in contaminated food samples. We envision that the use of automated pattern analysis would expedite and scale up the identification process. However, such automation would require images to be captured in a consistent manner, thereby enabling the creation of large repositories of high-quality images. Presently, there is no standard imaging technique for capturing images of beetle elytra, which consequently means, there is no standard method of beetle species identification through elytral pattern analysis. This deficiency inspired us to optimize and standardize imaging methods, especially for food-contaminating beetles. For this endeavor, we chose multiple species of beetles belonging to different families or genera that have near-identical elytral patterns, and thus are difficult to identify correctly at the species level. Our optimized imaging method provides enhanced images such that the elytral patterns between individual species could easily be distinguished from each other, through visual observation. We believe such standardization is critical in developing automated species identification of pantry beetles and/or other insects. This eventually may lead to improved taxonomical classification, allowing for better management of food contamination and ecological conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.