Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846254›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Sensitivity to geometric shape regularity in humans and baboons: A putative signature of human singularity.

Mathias Sablé-Meyer, Joël Fagot, Serge Caparos, Timo van Kerkoerle, Marie Amalric, Stanislas Dehaene

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diverse mathematical knowledge among indigenous Amazonians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Complexity is a unified cognitive kind.Nature human behaviour · 2026
    Article
  4. Cognitive maps as a medium for thought.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Continuity in geometric intuition between humans and monkeys.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Initial organization and progressive expansion of the math-responsive brain network during the first school years.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cognitive bridge between geometric and numerical learning in monkeys.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathias Sablé-MeyerCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France; mathias.sable-meyer@ens-cachan.fr stanislas.dehaene@cea.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-0844-0775
Joël FagotCognitive Psychology Laboratory, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, 13331 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-9685
Serge CaparosDepartment of Psychology, Fonctionnement et Dysfonctionnement Cognitifs : les âges de la vie, Université Paris 8, 92000 Nanterre, France.
Timo van KerkoerleCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1935-8216
Marie AmalricDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Stanislas DehaeneCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France; mathias.sable-meyer@ens-cachan.fr stanislas.dehaene@cea.fr.
Inserm · FRCarnegie Mellon University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Universitaire de France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among primates, humans are special in their ability to create and manipulate highly elaborate structures of language, mathematics, and music. Here we show that this sensitivity to abstract structure is already present in a much simpler domain: the visual perception of regular geometric shapes such as squares, rectangles, and parallelograms. We asked human subjects to detect an intruder shape among six quadrilaterals. Although the intruder was always defined by an identical amount of displacement of a single vertex, the results revealed a geometric regularity effect: detection was considerably easier when either the base shape or the intruder was a regular figure comprising right angles, parallelism, or symmetry rather than a more irregular shape. This effect was replicated in several tasks and in all human populations tested, including uneducated Himba adults and French kindergartners. Baboons, however, showed no such geometric regularity effect, even after extensive training. Baboon behavior was captured by convolutional neural networks (CNNs), but neither CNNs nor a variational autoencoder captured the human geometric regularity effect. However, a symbolic model, based on exact properties of Euclidean geometry, closely fitted human behavior. Our results indicate that the human propensity for symbolic abstraction permeates even elementary shape perception. They suggest a putative signature of human singularity and provide a challenge for nonsymbolic models of human shape perception.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsChild, PreschoolFemaleForm PerceptionHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPapioPattern Recognition, VisualSpecies SpecificityVision, OcularVisual Perceptioncomparative cognitiondevelopmental psychologygeometryhuman singularityneural network modeling

Identifiers

PMID33846254
PMCPMC8072260
OpenAlexW3156755576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.