Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846148›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives: a cross-sectional study from China.

Jingxuan Yang, Hua Bai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05905263 (The Effect of Virtual Reality Application on Student Satisfaction, Self-Confidence, and Anxiety Levels in Episiotomy Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05905263 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Virtual Reality Application on Student Satisfaction, Self-Confidence, and Anxiety Levels in Episiotomy Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled110ConditionsVirtual Reality, EpisiotomyArmsApplication group with virtual reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Brazilian obstetricians in relation to childbirth care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Effects of Ginger (Journal of caring sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A nationwide cross-sectional survey of episiotomy practice in China.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingxuan YangThe Third Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Hua BaiThe Third Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China sfyhlb3726@zzu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4944-7156
Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpisiotomy is still performed widely by obstetricians and midwives in some Chinese maternity units, but the reasons are unknown. This study aims to determine the knowledge, attitude and experience towards the practice of episiotomy among obstetricians and midwives in China's public hospitals and consider strategies to reduce its practice.

methodsA cross-sectional web survey using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted among obstetricians and midwives in 90 public hospitals in Henan Province, China.

results900 (82.21%) participants completed the questionnaire. Average knowledge level (4.15, SD=1.10) on complications and overuse was identified among participants. Episiotomy was performed more frequently in secondary hospitals than in tertiary hospitals (p<0.05). Senior clinicians were more likely to perform episiotomy than younger ones (p<0.05). Almost half of the clinicians (42.11%) considered the current rate of episiotomy (45%) to be right or too low. The most common reason for performing episiotomy identified by obstetricians (83.94%) and midwives (79.69%) was to reduce third-degree or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Both obstetricians (80.29%) and midwives (82.57%) agreed that the most significant obstacle to reducing the rate of episiotomy was lack of training on reducing perineal tears.

conclusionIn sum, episiotomy was driven by previous training, practitioners' experience and local norms rather than the latest medical evidence. Clinicians in secondary hospitals and senior clinicians are key training targets. It is urgent to improve current clinical policies and surgical procedure guidelines for obstetricians and midwives regarding episiotomy.

Indexed as

EpisiotomyMidwiferyChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPerineumPregnancyeducation & training (see medical education & training)maternal medicineperinatologyurogynaecology

Identifiers

PMID33846148
PMCPMC8047989
OpenAlexW3155633459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.