Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33845923›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2021

Rethinking and strengthening the Global Health Diplomacy through triangulated nexus between policy makers, scientists and the community in light of COVID-19 global crisis.

Mohammed AlKhaldi, Nigel James, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Sara Ahmed, Hamza Meghari, Kirsty Kaiser, Carel IJsselmuiden, Marcel Tanner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Health diplomacy in Africa-opportunities post-COVID-19.The Pan African medical journal · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed AlKhaldiMcGill University, Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada. mohammed.alkhaldi@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5609-3806
Nigel JamesHealth Policy & Demography/Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vijay Kumar ChattuDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sara AhmedFaculty of Medicine, School of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University Health Center, Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal, Canada.
Hamza MeghariGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kirsty KaiserCouncil on Health Research for Development, COHRED, Geneva, Switzerland.
Carel IJsselmuidenCouncil on Health Research for Development, COHRED, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marcel TannerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is considerably the biggest global health challenge of this modern era. Spreading across all regions of the world, this corona virus disease has disrupted even some of the most advanced economies and healthcare systems. With an increasing global death toll and no near end in sight, questions on the efficacy of global response mechanisms, including the role and relevancy of global health institutions, have emerged. Using a reflexive content analytic approach, this study sheds light on some of these questions, underscoring the disconnect between science, policymaking, and society. Global health funding approaches; politicization of the pandemic, including political blame gaming; mistrust of government and other institutions; and a lack of robust accountability measures are some of the pandemic response obstacles. However, COVID-19 has also presented an opportunity for a collaboration that may potentially solidify global solidarity. A pandemic response built on strategic global health diplomacy, vaccine diplomacy, and science diplomacy can spur both political and economic benefits, advancing development, health security, and justice. The virus thrives and flourishes in face of political divisions and lack of cooperation. While the current global crisis has exacerbated the existing social injustices in societies, national unity and global solidarity is essential to winning the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelPhysiciansCOVID-19DiplomacyGlobal HealthHumansPandemicsAnd science diplomacyCOVID-19Global health diplomacyPolicyVaccine diplomacy

Identifiers

PMID33845923
PMCPMC8041471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.