ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
MSIFinder: a python package for detecting MSI status using random forest classifier.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning and Experimental Validation of m6A RNA Methylation Related Signatures for Risk Prediction, Diagnostic Biomarkers, and Immune Subtypes in Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- A novel algorithm for the detection of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer using next‑generation sequencing data.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis of Oxidative Stress-Related Genes and Immune Infiltration Patterns in Vitiligo.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
- Informing immunotherapy with multi-omics driven machine learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- MSINGB: A Novel Computational Method Based on NGBoost for Identifying Microsatellite Instability Status from Tumor Mutation Annotation Data.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2023Article
- Microsatellite instability assessment is instrumental for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine: status quo and outlook.The EPMA journal · 2023Review
- DeltaMSI: artificial intelligence-based modeling of microsatellite instability scoring on next-generation sequencing data.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI) is a common genomic alteration in colorectal cancer, endometrial carcinoma, and other solid tumors. MSI is characterized by a high degree of polymorphism in microsatellite lengths owing to the deficiency in the mismatch repair system. Based on the degree, MSI can be classified as microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and microsatellite stable (MSS). MSI is a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy in advanced/metastatic solid tumors, especially in colorectal cancer patients. Several computational approaches based on target panel sequencing data have been used to detect MSI; however, they are considerably affected by the sequencing depth and panel size.
resultsWe developed MSIFinder, a python package for automatic MSI classification, using random forest classifier (RFC)-based genome sequencing, which is a machine learning technology. We included 19 MSI-H and 25 MSS samples as training sets. First, we selected 54 feature markers from the training sets, built an RFC model, and validated the classifier using a test set comprising 21 MSI-H and 379 MSS samples. With this test set, MSIFinder achieved a sensitivity (recall) of 1.0, a specificity of 0.997, an accuracy of 0.998, a positive predictive value of 0.954, an F1 score of 0.977, and an area under the curve of 0.999. To further verify the robustness and effectiveness of the model, we used a prospective cohort consisting of 18 MSI-H samples and 122 MSS samples. MSIFinder achieved a sensitivity (recall) of 1.0 and a specificity of 1.0. We discovered that MSIFinder is less affected by a low sequencing depth and can achieve a concordance of 0.993 while exhibiting a sequencing depth of 100×. Furthermore, we realized that MSIFinder is less affected by the panel size and can achieve a concordance of 0.99 when the panel size is 0.5 M (million bases).
conclusionThese results indicate that MSIFinder is a robust and effective MSI classification tool that can provide reliable MSI detection for scientific and clinical purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.