Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33845551›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and pain medicine2021

A comparative study of glottis visualization according to the method of lifting the epiglottis in video laryngoscopy: indirect and direct lifting methods.

Ji Youn Oh, Ji Hye Lee, Yu Yil Kim, Seung Min Baek, Da Wa Jung, Ji Hun Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In reply: Comparing devices for managing the difficult airway.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ji Youn OhDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea.
Ji Hye LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea.
Yu Yil KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea.
Seung Min BaekDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea.
Da Wa JungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea.
Ji Hun ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea.
Presbyterian Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe direct entry of the camera under the epiglottis may provide a better view of the glottis than the indirect lifting of the epiglottis by placing the Macintosh blade tip on the vallecula when using the video laryngoscope. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of two different methods of lifting the epiglottis during the visualization of glottis using video laryngoscopy in the same patient.

methodsThis prospective study enrolled 60 patients who underwent general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. In each patient, glottic views were obtained by directly (group DE) and indirectly lifting the epiglottis (group IE). These two methods were compared using the modified Cormack and Lehane grade and the percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score as assessment parameters.

resultsModified Cormack and Lehane grade showed a significant difference between the groups DE and IE (P = 0.004). The difference in the POGO score between the groups DE and IE was also statistically significant (87.5% and 64.4%, respectively; P < 0.001).

conclusionsOur results, therefore, revealed that the method of directly lifting epiglottis was better at exposing glottis than the method of indirectly lifting epiglottis using a video laryngoscope.

Indexed as

Endotracheal intubationEpiglottisGlottisLaryngoscopesLiftingVisualization

Identifiers

PMID33845551
PMCPMC8107246
OpenAlexW3144538625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.