Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33845486›Full record

ArticleInternational health2022

Physicians' perceptions of their knowledge and the preparedness of health facilities in Angola to diagnose and manage COVID-19.

Margarete Arrais, Welwitschia Dias, Jorge M R Gama, Miguel Brito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Margarete ArraisDepartment of Pulmonology , Military Hospital, Luanda, Angola.
Welwitschia DiasDepartment of Pulmonology , Military Hospital, Luanda, Angola.
Jorge M R GamaCentre of Mathematics and Applications, Faculty of Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Miguel BritoCISA - Health Research Centre of Angola, Caxito, Bengo, Angola.ORCID 0000-0001-6394-658X
Clínica Sagrada Esperança · AOInstituto Politécnico de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Beira Interior · PT

Funding

Orange County Community College
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare professionals represent a vulnerable group in terms of responding to COVID-19. Knowledge can influence healthcare professionals through adoption of the correct attitudes and practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate, by a questionnaire, the perceptions of physicians about their level of knowledge as well as conditions in their workplaces for dealing with COVID-19.

methodsA cross-sectional study of Angolan physicians took place from 11 May to 23 June 2020. A questionnaire was electronically shared across social media and via email.

resultsThe sample consisted of 637 valid questionnaires; 53% of respondents were female, 41% were aged 31-40 y and 79% were from Luanda province. About 51% of physicians perceived that they had adequate knowledge about COVID-19 and 64% used personal protective equipment. These figures were higher among specialists from the province of Luanda. About 81% stated that their health units lacked the technical capacity to diagnose COVID-19. Only 35% of health units have chest tomography equipment; 44% are prepared for the care and/or isolation of patients. Only 33% of units are running intensive care units. The main concerns of physicians were training opportunities and limited access to personal protective equipment.

conclusionThe results show that it is necessary to strengthen physicians' knowledge about COVID-19, as well as to improve the conditions of the health units, so as to promote safe practices.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansAngolaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesAngolaCOVID-19healthcare unitsknowledgephysicians

Identifiers

PMID33845486
PMCPMC8083292
OpenAlexW3154293623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.