Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33844862›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2021

Venetoclax with azacitidine or decitabine in blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: A multicenter series of 32 consecutive cases.

Naseema Gangat, Paola Guglielmelli, Natasha Szuber, Kebede H Begna, Mrinal M Patnaik, Mark R Litzow, Aref Al-Kali, James M Foran, Jeanne M Palmer, Hassan Alkhateeb and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Naseema GangatDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9104-6172
Paola GuglielmelliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, CRIMM, Center Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1809-284X
Natasha SzuberDepartment of Hematology, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Kebede H BegnaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2730-8593
Mrinal M PatnaikDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6998-662X
Mark R LitzowDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9816-6302
Aref Al-KaliDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
James M ForanDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Jeanne M PalmerDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Hassan AlkhateebDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michelle A ElliottDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7366-9886
Curtis A HansonDivision of Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Animesh PardananiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9084-4148
Francesco MannelliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, CRIMM, Center Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4810-6501
Alessandro M VannucchiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, CRIMM, Center Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5755-0730
Ayalew TefferiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4605-3821
Mayo Clinic · USAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITJacksonville College · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venetoclax (Ven) combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has now emerged as an effective treatment regimen for acute myeloid leukemia, in both de novo and relapsed/refractory setting. The current multicenter study retrospectively examined Ven + HMA treatment outcome among 32 patients (median age 69 years; 59% males) with blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP). Pre-leukemic phenotype included essential thrombocythemia (ET)/post-ET myelofibrosis (34%), polycythemia vera (PV)/post-PV myelofibrosis (38%) and primary myelofibrosis (28%). Twenty-nine study patients were fully annotated cytogenetically and molecularly (NGS): 69% harbored complex karyotype and/or mutations, including TP53 (41%), IDH1/2 (21%), ASXL1 (21%), N/KRAS (14%), SRSF2 (10%), EZH2 (10%) and U2AF1 (7%). All patients received Ven combined with either azacitidine (n = 12) or decitabine (n = 20); either up front (n = 23) or after failing another induction therapy (n = 9). Complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery was achieved in 14 (44%) patients and was more likely to occur in the absence of pre-leukemic PV/post-PV myelofibrosis phenotype (p < .01), complex karyotype (p < .01) or K/NRAS (p = .03) mutations; seven of eight patients (88%) without vs four of 21 (19%) with complex karyotype or K/NRAS mutation achieved CR/CRi (p < .01); all 11 informative patients with pre-leukemic PV/post-PV myelofibrosis phenotype displayed complex karyotype (p < .01). In contrast, neither TP53 (p = .45) nor IDH1/2 (p = .63) mutations affected response. Compared to historical controls treated with HMA alone (n = 26), the CR/CRi rate (44% vs 4%) and median survival (8 vs 5.5 months) were more favorable with Ven + HMA, but without significant difference in overall survival. Importantly, six patients with CR/CRi subsequently received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). Note, Ven + HMA produces robust CR/CRi rates in MPN-BP, especially in the absence of RAS mutations and complex karyotype, thus enabling AHSCT, in some patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAzacitidineBlast CrisisBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDecitabineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyeloproliferative DisordersRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsAzacitidineBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicDecitabineSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID33844862
PMCPMC8251544
OpenAlexW3156234252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.