ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2021
Single Magnetic Particle Motion in Magnetomotive Ultrasound: An Analytical Model and Experimental Validation.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A finite element analysis model for magnetomotive ultrasound elastometry magnet design with experimental validation.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2025Article
- Article
- A Comprehensive Review on the Viscoelastic Parameters Used for Engineering Materials, Including Soft Materials, and the Relationships between Different Damping Parameters.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Elastometry of clot phantoms via magnetomotive ultrasound-based resonant acoustic spectroscopy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Modelling of magnetic microbubbles to evaluate contrast enhanced magnetomotive ultrasound in lymph nodes - a pre-clinical study.The British journal of radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetomotive Ultrasound (MMUS) is an emerging imaging modality, in which magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are used as contrast agents. MNPs are driven by a time-varying magnetic force, and the resulting movement of the surrounding tissue is detected with a signal processing algorithm. However, there is currently no analytical model to quantitatively predict this magnetically-induced displacement. Toward the goal of predicting motion due to forces on the distribution of MNPs, in this work, a model originally derived from the Navier-Stokes equation for the motion of a single magnetic particle subject to a magnetic gradient force is presented and validated. Displacement amplitudes for a spatially inhomogeneous and temporally sinusoidal force were measured as a function of force amplitude and Young's modulus, and the predicted linear and inverse relationships were confirmed in gelatin phantoms, respectively, with three out of four data sets exhibiting R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.