ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2021
Evaluation of camera settings for photogrammetric reconstruction of humanoid phantoms for EBRT bolus and HDR surface brachytherapy applications.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smartphone-based scans of palate models of newborns with cleft lip and palate: Outlooks for three-dimensional image capturing and machine learning plate tool.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025Article
- Characterization of novel 3D-printed metal shielding for brachytherapy applicators.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Neuroanatomical photogrammetric models using smartphones: a comparison of apps.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Synthetic cranial MRI from 3D optical surface scans using deep learning for radiation therapy treatment planning.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- A Simple Way to Reduce 3D Model Deformation in Smartphone Photogrammetry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of optical 3D scanning system for radiotherapy use.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2022Article
- A dosimetric comparison of CT- and photogrammetry- generated 3D printed HDR brachytherapy surface applicators.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fabrication of brachytherapy surface moulds is considered laborious and time consuming that often result in repeated attempts due to incorrect catheter positioning or the presence of air gaps. 3-dimensional printing using low-cost and reliable materials has allowed the rapid creation of patient-specific surface mould applicators to be achieved using patient imaging data obtained via CT scan. In this study we investigate whether an alternative approach using photogrammetry techniques can improve this process and how camera settings and object texture affect the reconstructions. Two humanoid phantoms, an anthropomorphic RANDO phantom and a Laerdal Little Anne CPR training manikin were used in this study. Both were imaged using a Nikon D5600 DSLR and Nokia 3.1 smartphone camera and reconstructed using Agisoft Metashape software. CT scans of both phantoms were taken as references for comparing the photogrammetry reconstructions. Models were reconstructed from different photo sets and assessed by distance to agreement with the CT models. Both phantoms were effectively reconstructed for most experiments. Increasing the number of photos used produced the better reconstructions while in general, reconstructions using video data were poor. The two phantoms were reconstructed at a similar quality. Background light that caused undesirable reflections significantly reduced reconstruction quality. Applying a non-reflective tape to the affected regions provided a suitable method for reducing their effects. Photogrammetry techniques were effectively able to reconstruct 3-dimensional models of both phantom. The camera settings and lighting did have a profound effect on the reconstruction quality and should be chosen appropriately depending on the scene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33844156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.