Comparison of intraocular pressure during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy performed using an articulating laparoscopic instrument is feasible and more efficient.Frontiers in surgery · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taniya BhoopatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

Pawan ChansaenrojDepartment of Surgery, Somdech Phra Pinklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. pwying@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-0990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair are standard laparoscopic procedures for inguinal hernia repair. Some evidence has shown that pneumoperitoneum can cause an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) during surgery. This study aimed to compare intraoperative IOP following extraperitoneal CO

methodsThis study is a prospective cohort study. Patients who had inguinal hernias suitable for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were assigned to undergo the TEP or TAPP approach. We measured preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative IOP. The IOP of the TEP and TAPP groups was evaluated using a t test. The relations between peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and end-tidal CO

resultsThere were 50 patients in this study (TEP group n = 25, TAPP group n = 25). The change in intraoperative IOP from the preoperative measurement to the measurement after CO

conclusionsThere was no significant intraoperative IOP change during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Both the TEP and TAPP techniques can be performed safely without increasing intraoperative IOP.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopyHerniorrhaphyHumansIntraocular PressureProspective StudiesRecurrenceSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeInguinal hernia repairIntraocular pressureLaparoscopic surgeryPneumoperitoneumPostoperative visual loss

Identifiers

PMID33844088

DOI10.4293/JSLS.2016.00078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.