Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33844064›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Validating the 'CUT score' risk stratification tool for indeterminate thyroid nodules using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology.

Sapir Pinhas, Idit Tessler, Luba Pasherstnik Bizer, Khaled Khalilia, Meir Warman, Meital Adi, Doron Halperin, Oded Cohen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sapir Pinhas *Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Idit Tessler *Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel. idit.tessler@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3297-7022
Luba Pasherstnik BizerHadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Khaled KhaliliaHadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Meir WarmanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Meital AdiHadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Doron HalperinDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Oded CohenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeManaging intermediate thyroid nodules remains challenging. The CUT score is an Italian metanalysis-based cytologic (SIAPEC-IAP) scoring system, designed to assist clinicians. However, it was never evaluated against the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (BSRTC). This study aims to validate its utility for BSRTC III and IV nodules in a non-Italian population.

methodsWe collected all BSRTC III and IV thyroid nodules with a documented final pathology between 2010 and 2020. We calculated the C + U components of the CUT score using retrospective clinical (C) data collection and reevaluation of preoperative sonography (U) examination. The cytology (T) component which originally referred to the five-tiered SIAPEC-IAP cytologic classification was replaced by the corresponding BSRTC categories. Optimal test performances were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Data were analyzed twice with considering of NIFTP as benign and as malignant.

resultsAfter exclusions, 62 nodules from 61 patients were included (50% BSRTC III, 50% BSRTC IV). Malignant nodules demonstrated a significantly higher C + U score compared with benign in both categories. The C + U cutoff value for BSRTC III was 5.25 (sensitivity and specificity of 69.23% and 66.67%, respectively, AUC = 0.72, p-value = 0.016), and 5.75 for BSRTC IV (sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 76.5%, respectively, AUC = 0.84, p-value < 0.001).

conclusionOur study suggests that the CUT score is applicable for both BSRTC III and IV nodules, and highlights the need for internal validations, since the cutoffs found were higher than previously reported.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentBSRTCIndeterminateRisk of malignancyScoring systemThyroid noduleUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.