Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33844022›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021

Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: results from systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.

Philip J Mease, Iain B McInnes, Lai-Shan Tam, Kiefer Eaton, Steve Peterson, Agata Schubert, Soumya D Chakravarty, Anna Parackal, Chetan S Karyekar, Sandhya Nair and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. State of the Art Review on the Treatment of Psoriatic Disease.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Philip J MeaseSwedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health & University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6620-0457
Iain B McInnesUniversity of Glasgow, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, United Kingdom.
Lai-Shan TamThe Chinese University of Hong Kong and The Prince of Wales Hospital, Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-6410-8852
Kiefer EatonEVERSANA, Marketing and Market Access, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4369-233X
Steve PetersonJanssen Global Services LLC, Immunology, Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Horsham, PA, USA.
Agata SchubertJanssen-Cilag Ltd, Dermatology and Rheumatology, Warsaw, Poland.
Soumya D ChakravartyJanssen Scientific Affairs LLC, Immunology, Horsham.ORCID 0000-0001-7957-838X
Anna ParackalEVERSANA, Marketing and Market Access, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Chetan S KaryekarJanssen Global Services LLC, Immunology, Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Horsham, PA, USA.
Sandhya NairJanssen Pharmaceutical NV, Health Economics Design and Analytics, Beerse, Belgium.
Wolf-Henning BoehnckeGeneva University Hospitals, Department of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christopher RitchlinUniversity of Rochester, Department of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
EVERSANA (Canada) · CAJanssen (Belgium) · BEJanssen (United States) · USChinese University of Hong Kong · HKProvidence College · USUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe efficacy of the novel interleukin (IL)-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has recently been demonstrated in two phase 3 trials (DISCOVER-1 & -2) but has not been evaluated vs other targeted therapies for PsA. The objective was to compare guselkumab to targeted therapies for PsA for safety and joint and skin efficacy through network meta-analysis (NMA).

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted in January 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials. Bayesian NMAs were performed to compare treatments on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response, mean change from baseline in van der Heijde-Sharp (vdH-S) score, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100 response, adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).

resultsTwenty-six phase 3 studies evaluating 13 targeted therapies for PsA were included. For ACR 20 response, guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W) was comparable to IL-17A inhibitors and subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. Similar findings were observed for ACR 50 and 70. For vdH-S score, guselkumab Q8W was comparable to other agents except intravenous TNF therapies. Results for PASI 75 and PASI 90 response suggested guselkumab Q8W was better than most other agents. For PASI 100, guselkumab Q8W was comparable to other active agents. For AEs and SAEs, guselkumab Q8W ranked highly but comparative conclusions were uncertain. Similar results were observed for all outcomes for guselkumab 100 mg every four weeks.

conclusionsIn this NMA, guselkumab demonstrated favorable arthritis efficacy comparable to IL-17A and subcutaneous TNF inhibitors while offering better PASI response relative to many other treatments.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, PsoriaticHumansTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsguselkumabACRbiologicsguselkumabinterleukinNMAPASIpsoriatic arthritisSLRTNF

Identifiers

PMID33844022
PMCPMC8121447
OpenAlexW3152589273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.