ArticleJAMA network open2021
Clinical and Demographic Factors, Treatment Patterns, and Overall Survival Associated With Rare Triple-Negative Breast Carcinomas in the US.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell RNA sequencing of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast reveals cellular heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment features.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Impact of androgen receptor on triple negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analytic study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Metaplastic breast carcinoma versus triple-negative breast cancer: distinct metastatic patterns and inferior overall survival in a matched retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Seven Shades of Triple Negativity: A Review Unveiling the Low-Grade Spectrum of Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Impact of Travel Burden on Timeliness of Care and Overall Survival for Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- The Metaplastic Conundrum: A National Cancer Database Analysis of Metaplastic versus Triple-Negative Ductal Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Predictive markers of rapid disease progression and chemotherapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer patients following postoperative adjuvant therapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prioritizing cases from a multi-institutional cohort for a dataset of pathologist annotations.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and oncological outcomes in metaplastic breast cancer: a Brazilian multicenter analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Promising Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Immunotherapy in Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Article
- Article
- A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: Features and treatments.Cancer science · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer Subtypes: Clinicopathologic Features and Treatment Considerations.Current breast cancer reports · 2024Article
- Sonographic and clinicopathologic features of metaplastic breast carcinoma and infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a comparative single-center cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting rapid relapse in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Current Understanding and Future Directions.Clinical breast cancer · 2023Review
- Rare subtypes of triple negative breast cancer: Current understanding and future directions.NPJ breast cancer · 2023Review
- Characteristics of recurrence, predictors for relapse and prognosis of rapid relapse triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast May Be Exempt from Adjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Adjuvant Treatments for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast: A Population-Based, Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study from the SEER Database.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Triple-negative breast cancers are known collectively to demonstrate a more aggressive clinical course and earlier recurrence than cancers of other histological subtypes. However, the literature on rare triple-negative breast cancers and the association of histological type with survival and risk of metastasis is sparse. Objective: To present the clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment patterns, and overall survival (OS) for histologically rare (<10% of breast cancers) triple-negative breast cancer types: medullary carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and metaplastic breast carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was performed in the US using data reported by the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2016. Confirmed cases of medullary carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, and metaplastic breast cancer were analyzed. Univariable analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were performed. Data analysis was performed from April to May 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 5-year OS. Secondary outcomes included site of metastasis, effect of immunohistochemistry, management, and 2-year mortality. Results: A total of 8479 patients with breast cancer (mean [SD] age; 62.6 [14.3] years; 8435 women [99.48%]) were analyzed. Metaplastic carcinoma was the most commonly diagnosed histological type in this cohort, with 6867 patients (81%), followed by 1357 (16%) with adenoid cystic carcinoma and only 255 (3%) with medullary carcinoma. Medullary carcinoma presented earlier in life, at a median (interquartile range) age of 53 (45-62) years, compared with 62 (53-72) years for patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma and 63 (52-74) years for patients with metaplastic carcinoma. The proportion of tumors with triple-negative immunohistochemistry varied by histological type for medullary carcinoma (57 patients [22.4%]), adenoid cystic carcinoma (653 patients [48.1%]), and metaplastic carcinoma (3637 patients [53.0%]). Patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma were less likely to receive radiotherapy (711 patients [52.4%]) and chemotherapy (175 patients [12.9%]) compared with patients with medullary carcinoma (radiotherapy, 156 patients [61.2%]; chemotherapy, 190 patients [74.5%]) and metaplastic carcinoma (radiotherapy, 3416 patients [49.7%]; chemotherapy, 4709 patients [68.6%]). The 5-year OS rate was superior for patients with medullary (91.7%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (88.4%) compared with patients with metaplastic carcinoma (63.1%). The 5-year mortality rate for adenoid cystic carcinoma was 8.33% vs 36.91% for metaplastic carcinoma. Conclusions and Relevance: Nationally, over the course of 7 years, medullary carcinoma was most common and metaplastic carcinoma had the worst 5-year OS among the rare histological breast cancer subtypes analyzed. Factors associated with a poor prognosis for metaplastic carcinoma included advanced stage, lung metastasis, older age, and not receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Future research focusing on rare subtypes of breast cancer is desirable and could inform the optimal management of these relatively understudied carcinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.