Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843604›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2021

Impact of a Face-To-Face Versus Smartphone App Versus Combined Breastfeeding Intervention Targeting Fathers: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jane Anne Scott, Sharyn K Burns, Yvonne L Hauck, Roslyn C Giglia, Anita M Jorgensen, Becky Kate White, Annegret Martin, Suzanne Robinson, Satvinder S Dhaliwal, Colin W Binns and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Measuring User Engagement with a Socially Connected, Gamified Health Promotion Mobile App.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jane Anne ScottSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-9054
Sharyn K BurnsSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1551-2805
Yvonne L HauckSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-2777
Roslyn C GigliaSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-1251
Anita M JorgensenSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-690X
Becky Kate WhiteSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3234-1742
Annegret MartinSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-2990
Suzanne RobinsonSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5703-6475
Satvinder S DhaliwalCurtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-1042
Colin W BinnsSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6220-3933
Bruce R MaycockSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7988-9740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the recognized health and economic benefits of exclusive breastfeeding, few Australian infants are exclusively breastfed beyond 5 months of age. Social support for breastfeeding, in particular the support of an infant's father, has been identified as a crucial element for successful breastfeeding.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of various father-focused breastfeeding interventions in terms of key infant feeding outcomes.

methodsThe study was a 4-arm, factorial, randomized controlled trial conducted in Perth, Australia. The trial arms included a control group and 3 interventions, consisting of a face-to-face father-focused antenatal breastfeeding class facilitated by a male peer facilitator; Milk Man, a breastfeeding smartphone app designed specifically for fathers; and a combination of both interventions. Expecting couples were recruited from hospital-based antenatal classes and block randomized to 1 of the 4 arms. Each partner completed surveys at recruitment and at 6 weeks and 26 weeks postpartum. Primary outcomes were duration of exclusive and any breastfeeding. Secondary outcomes included age of introduction of formula and complementary foods, maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy, and partner postpartum support.

resultsA total of 1426 couples were recruited from public (443/1426, 31.1%) and private (983/1426, 68.9%) hospitals. Of these, 76.6% (1092/1426) of fathers completed the baseline questionnaire, 58.6% (836/1426) completed the 6-week follow-up questionnaire, and 49.2% (702/1426) completed the 26-week follow-up questionnaire. The average age of fathers who completed the baseline questionnaire was 33.6 (SD 5.2) years; the majority were born in Australia (76.4%) and had attended university (61.8%). There were no significant differences between the control and any of the intervention groups in any of the infant feeding outcomes or level of breastfeeding self-efficacy and postpartum partner support reported by mothers.

conclusionsThis study did not demonstrate that any intervention was superior to another or that any intervention was inferior to the standard care delivered in routine antenatal classes. Further studies are needed to test the effectiveness of these interventions in more socioeconomically diverse populations that are likely to benefit most from additional partner supports.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614000605695; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12614000605695. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12884-015-0601-5.

Indexed as

breastfeedingfathersfeedinginfantsmHealth, smartphone apppeer supportsmartphonesocial support

Identifiers

PMID33843604
PMCPMC8076985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.