Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843603›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2021

Participatory Design of an Activities-Based Collective Mentoring Program in After-School Care Settings: Connect, Promote, and Protect Program.

Alyssa C Milton, Elizabeth Stewart, Laura Ospina-Pinillos, Tracey Davenport, Ian B Hickie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alyssa C MiltonBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-0123
Elizabeth StewartBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1299-5423
Laura Ospina-PinillosBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-1511
Tracey DavenportBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4218-9238
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-9895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOut of school hours care (OSHC) services provide a unique opportunity to deliver early intervention programs to enhance primary school-aged children's social, emotional, physical, and cognitive well-being; however, such programs are currently lacking.

objectiveThis study aims to address the lack of well-being programs for children accessing OSHC services in the research literature by using participatory design (PD) to collaboratively develop and test an OSHC well-being program-the connect, promote, and protect program (CP3).

methodsThe study employed methods of PD, user (acceptance) testing, and iterative knowledge translation to develop a novel well-being program framework-CP3-with key stakeholders (eg, children, OSHC staff, volunteers, families, clinicians, educators, and researchers). Thematic techniques were used to interpret and translate the qualitative information obtained during the research and design cycles.

resultsThe co-design process generated the CP3 model, which comprises a group-based mentoring approach to facilitate enhanced activities in OSHC settings. Activities are underpinned by 4 key principles of program delivery: build well-being and resilience, broaden horizons, inspire and engage, and connect communities.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, the CP3 program is the first co-designed well-being program developed specifically for OSHC services. This co-design process is key to ensuring local community needs-particularly those of young people accessing OSHC-are met and that these individuals are meaningfully and actively involved in all stages of the research and design process, from conception to implementation, evaluation, and continuous improvement.

Indexed as

after school carechildrencommunity consultationhealthparticipatory designprogram developmentwell-being

Identifiers

PMID33843603
PMCPMC8076982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.