Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843546›Full record

ReviewCardiology in the young2022

Medical education and training within congenital cardiology: current global status and future directions in a post COVID-19 world.

Colin J McMahon, Justin T Tretter, Andrew N Redington, Frances Bu'Lock, Liesl Zühlke, Ruth Heying, Sandra Mattos, R Krishna Kumar, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Jonathan D Windram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology in the young, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surgery for congenital heart disease in Pakistan-the challenges and solutions.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Rethinking Paediatric Cardiology Training in Canada.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Colin J McMahonDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-9338
Justin T TretterThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-3752
Andrew N RedingtonThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Frances Bu'LockDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, East Midlands Congenital Heart Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Liesl ZühlkeDivision of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-2760
Ruth HeyingDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-0823
Sandra MattosDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Royal Portuguese Hospital, Recife, Brazil.
R Krishna KumarAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4343-0951
Jeffrey P JacobsCongenital Heart Center, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jonathan D WindramDepartment of Cardiology, Mazankowski Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S005242/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite enormous strides in our field with respect to patient care, there has been surprisingly limited dialogue on how to train and educate the next generation of congenital cardiologists. This paper reviews the current status of training and evolving developments in medical education pertinent to congenital cardiology. The adoption of competency-based medical education has been lauded as a robust framework for contemporary medical education over the last two decades. However, inconsistencies in frameworks across different jurisdictions remain, and bridging gaps between competency frameworks and clinical practice has proved challenging. Entrustable professional activities have been proposed as a solution, but integration of such activities into busy clinical cardiology practices will present its own challenges. Consequently, this pivot towards a more structured approach to medical education necessitates the widespread availability of appropriately trained medical educationalists, a development that will better inform curriculum development, instructional design, and assessment. Differentiation between superficial and deep learning, the vital role of rich formative feedback and coaching, should guide our trainees to become self-regulated learners, capable of critical reasoning yet retaining an awareness of uncertainty and ambiguity. Furthermore, disruptive innovations such as "technology enhanced learning" may be leveraged to improve education, especially for trainees from low- and middle-income countries. Each of these initiatives will require resources, widespread advocacy and raised awareness, and publication of supporting data, and so it is especially gratifying that Cardiology in the Young has fostered a progressive approach, agreeing to publish one or two articles in each journal issue in this domain.

Indexed as

CardiologistsCardiologyCOVID-19Education, MedicalCurriculumHumansSARS-CoV-2Adult congenital heart diseasecongenital cardiologycongenital heart diseaseeducationpaediatric cardiologytraining

Identifiers

PMID33843546
PMCPMC8111178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.