Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843291›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2021

Inpatient Insulin Pen Implementation, Waste, and Potential Cost Savings: A Community Hospital Experience.

Urooj Najmi, Waqas Zia Haque, Umair Ansari, Eyerusalem Yemane, Lee Ann Alexander, Christina Lee, Andrew P Demidowich, Mahsa Motevalli, Periwinkle Mackay, Cynthia Tucker and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Endocrine Hospitalist: Enhancing the Quality of Diabetes Care.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Urooj NajmiAmerican International School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Waqas Zia HaqueJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6754-7658
Umair AnsariPharmacy Department, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7245-7585
Eyerusalem YemanePharmacy Department, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lee Ann AlexanderPharmacy Department, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christina LeePharmacy Department, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Andrew P DemidowichJohns Hopkins Community Physicians at Howard County General Hospital, Columbia, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5925-1117
Mahsa MotevalliJohns Hopkins Community Physicians at Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Periwinkle MackayDepartment of Nursing Education, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cynthia TuckerDepartment of Nursing Education, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cindy NotobartoloDepartment of Safety, Security and Employee Health Services, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Poroshat SartippourDepartment of Management Information System, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jennifer RaynorPharmacy Department, Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mihail ZilbermintDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4047-7260
Suburban Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsulin pen injectors ("pens") are intended to facilitate a patient's self-administration of insulin and can be used in hospitalized patients as a learning opportunity. Unnecessary or duplicate dispensation of insulin pens is associated with increased healthcare costs.

methodsInpatient dispensation of insulin pens in a 240-bed community hospital between July 2018 and July 2019 was analyzed. We calculated the percentage of insulin pens unnecessarily dispensed for patients who had the same type of insulin pen assigned. The estimated cost of insulin pen waste was calculated. A pharmacist-led task force group implemented hospital-wide awareness and collaborated with hospital leadership to define goals and interventions.

results9516 insulin pens were dispensed to 3121 patients. Of the pens dispensed, 6451 (68%) were insulin aspart and 3065 (32%) were glargine. Among patients on insulin aspart, an average of 2.2 aspart pens was dispensed per patient, but only an estimated 1.2 pens/patient were deemed necessary. Similarly, for inpatients prescribed glargine, an average of 2.1 pens/patient was dispensed, but only 1.3 pens/patient were necessary. A number of gaps were identified and interventions were undertaken to reduce insulin pen waste, which resulted in a significant decrease in both aspart (p = 0.0002) and glargine (p = 0.0005) pens/patient over time. Reductions in pen waste resulted in an estimated cost savings of $66 261 per year.

conclusionsIn a community hospital setting, identification of causes leading to unnecessary insulin dispensation and implementation of hospital-wide staff education led to change in insulin pen dispensation practice. These changes translated into considerable cost savings and facilitated diabetes self-management education.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2InpatientsCost SavingsHospitals, CommunityHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulincostinpatient diabetes managementinsulinpenquality improvementwaste

Identifiers

PMID33843291
PMCPMC8258519
OpenAlexW3154864544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.