Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843228›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2021

Machine Learning Prediction of Allosteric Drug Activity from Molecular Dynamics.

Filippo Marchetti, Elisabetta Moroni, Alessandro Pandini, Giorgio Colombo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Ligand Pose and Functional Class Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Filippo MarchettiDepartment of Chemistry, Università Degli Studi di Pavia, Viale Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Elisabetta MoroniIstituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche, Via Mario Bianco 9, 20131 Milano, Italy.
Alessandro PandiniBrunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, U.K.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4158-233X
Giorgio ColomboDepartment of Chemistry, Università Degli Studi di Pavia, Viale Taramelli 12, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1318-668X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allosteric drugs have been attracting increasing interest over the past few years. In this context, it is common practice to use high-throughput screening for the discovery of non-natural allosteric drugs. While the discovery stage is supported by a growing amount of biological information and increasing computing power, major challenges still remain in selecting allosteric ligands and predicting their effect on the target protein's function. Indeed, allosteric compounds can act both as inhibitors and activators of biological responses. Computational approaches to the problem have focused on variations on the theme of molecular docking coupled to molecular dynamics with the aim of recovering information on the (long-range) modulation typical of allosteric proteins.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationAllosteric RegulationBiphenyl CompoundsCoumarinsDihydropyridinesHumansMolecular StructurePyronesbiphenylBiphenyl CompoundsCoumarinsDihydropyridinesgoniothalaminPyrones

Identifiers

PMID33843228
PMCPMC8154828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.