Observational studyTurkish journal of medical sciences2021
A new approach to predicting shoulder dystocia: fetal clavicle measurement
Observational study in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06283277 (Fetal Clavicular Measurement to Predict Fetal Macrosomia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fetal Clavicular Measurement to Predict Fetal Macrosomia: A Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shoulder Dystocia: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Diagnosis, Prevention, Complications, Prognosis, and Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- The effect of biacromial and bideltoid distance on shoulder dystocia and birth weight in newbornsJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2022Article
- Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between second- and third-trimester clavicle lengths and birth weight and shoulder dystocia. Materials and methods: This prospective observational study included 181 patients who presented to the Private Etlik Lokman Hekim Hospital for routine pregnancy visits between March 2019 and March 2020. In addition to routine pregnancy examinations, the patients also underwent ultrasonography twice at weeks 20–23 and 33–36 to determine the length of the fetal clavicle. The patients were evaluated for shoulder dystocia in the second stage of labor. The birth weight of the neonates was recorded. The primary objective of this study was to establish the relationship between third-trimester clavicle length and shoulder dystocia. Results: Fetal clavicle length increases in the second trimester with the advancing gestational week but does not significantly change in the third trimester. We did not observe any significant difference for second trimester clavicle length between the type of delivery, birth weight, or shoulder dystocia. Moreover, we did not observe any significant difference for third trimester clavicle length between types of delivery. However, we found a significant relationship between third trimester clavicle length and birth weight and shoulder dystocia. The median third-trimester clavicle length was 39.5 mm (range: 30.7–43.9) in neonates who did not develop shoulder dystocia and 42.5 mm (range: 41.4–43.1) in the 3 neonates who developed shoulder dystocia. The third-trimester clavicle length cut-off for shoulder dystocia was calculated as 41.35 mm (sensitivity: 100.00%, specificity: 83.82%, accuracy: 84.5%). The third-trimester clavicle length cut-off for macrosomia (defined as birth weight of ≥4100 g) was 40.75 mm (sensitivity: 87.50%, specificity: 77.56%, accuracy: 78.05%). Conclusion: Third-trimester fetal clavicle length, an important component of biacromial diameter, as measured by ultrasonography, is a practical and significant method for predicting macrosomia and shoulder dystocia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.