ArticleFEBS letters2021
Sharing biological data: why, when, and how.
Article in FEBS letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis examining fetal sex-specific placental DNA methylation intensities and estimated cell composition post IVF.Molecular human reproduction · 2025Pooled it
- Supporting researcher compliance: assessing institutional readiness for the 2023 NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- Lessons learned on stakeholder engagement in radiation protection, and communication and dissemination of results from the radonorm project.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2026Article
- Multimodal data fusion: integrating PET/MRI and liquid biopsy for a holistic view of cancer biology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Towards a holistic epidemiology ofFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Give credit where credit is due, also for omics data.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Making genomic data FAIR through effective Data Portals.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Biological Dynamics with Aggregate Data.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Tier-based standards for FAIR sequence data and metadata sharing in microbiome research.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Cell Mapping Toolkit: an end-to-end pipeline for mapping subcellular organization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Efficient data filtering with multiple group conditions: a command tool for bioinformatics data analysis.aBIOTECH · 2025Article
- The Hallmarks of Predictive Oncology.Cancer discovery · 2025Article
- SEND: a suite of tools for the easy sharing of linked biological data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Systematic data analysis pipeline for quantitative morphological cell phenotyping.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Visualizing Volumetric and Segmentation Data using Mol* Volumes & Segmentations 2.0.Current protocols · 2024Article
- A how-to guide for code sharing in biology.PLoS biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Pathways to a Shiny Future: Building the Foundation for Computational Physical Chemistry and Biophysics in 2050.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2024Review
- PyCoM: a python library for large-scale analysis of residue-residue coevolution data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.