Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843052›Full record

SynthesisClinical genetics2021

Clinical management among individuals with variant of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sukh Makhnoon, Erica M Bednar, Kate J Krause, Susan K Peterson, Maria A Lopez-Olivo

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How variants of uncertain significance affect clinical decisions: A systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reclassification of VUS inGenetics in medicine open · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sukh MakhnoonDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3380-3833
Erica M BednarClinical Cancer Genetics and the Cancer Prevention and Control Platform, Moon Shots Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kate J KrauseResearch Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Susan K PetersonDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Maria A Lopez-OlivoDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Improving decision-making in patients with resectable melanoma and pre-existing autoimmune disease considering immune checkpoint inhibitionK08CA237619 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LOPEZ-OLIVO, MARIA DE LOS ANGELES · 2020 to 2024
$938k
Multilevel investigation of uncertain and reclassified genomic variants in clinical oncologyR00CA256216 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAKHNOON, SUKH · 2022 to 2024
$693k
Multilevel investigation of uncertain and reclassified genomic variants in clinical oncologyK99CA256216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MAKHNOON, SUKH · 2021 to 2022
$216k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237619NCI NIH HHS K99 CA256216NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R00 CA256216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improper medical use of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) remains a concern in hereditary cancer genetic testing. The goal of this study was to assess the association between pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP), VUS, and benign and likely benign (B/LB) genetic test results and cancer-related surgical and screening management. Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO were conducted from 1946 to August 26, 2020. Eligible studies included individuals with cancer genetic test result and surgical or screening management outcomes. We reviewed 885 abstracts and 22 studies that reported relevant surgical and screening outcomes were included. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher surgical rates among individuals with P/LP than among those with VUS for therapeutic mastectomy with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (OR = 7.35, 95% CI, 4.14-13.64), prophylactic mastectomy (OR = 3.05, 95% CI, 1.5-6.19), and oophorectomy (OR = 6.46, 95% CI, 3.64-11.44). There were no significant differences in therapeutic mastectomy, or breast conservation or lumpectomy rates between individuals with P/LP and VUS, or in any outcomes between patients with VUS and B/LB. Studies evaluating screening outcomes were limited, and results were conflicting. Comprehensive analysis do not indicate that a significant number of individuals with VUS results undergo inappropriate clinical management.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseProphylactic Surgical ProceduresBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyProphylactic MastectomyBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanbenign variantcancergenetic test resultmeta-analysispathogenic variantscreeningsurgerysystematic reviewvariant of uncertain significance

Identifiers

PMID33843052
PMCPMC8672382
OpenAlexW3154773381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.