Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843035›Full record

ArticleCardiology journal2021

Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Selected messages from the European Society of Cardiology document and lessons learned from the new guidelines on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome.

Justyna Domienik-Karłowicz, Karolina Kupczyńska, Błażej Michalski, Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka, Szymon Darocha, Piotr Dobrowolski, Maciej Wybraniec, Wojciech Wańha, Miłosz Jaguszewski

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Justyna Domienik-KarłowiczDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. jdomienik@tlen.pl.
Karolina KupczyńskaDepartment of Cardiology, W. Bieganski Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Błażej MichalskiDepartment of Cardiology, W. Bieganski Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Agnieszka Kapłon-CieślickaChair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Szymon DarochaDepartment of Pulmonary Circulation, Thromboembolic Diseases and Cardiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, European Health Centre, Otwock, Poland.
Piotr DobrowolskiDepartment of Hypertension, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej WybraniecFirst Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Wojciech WańhaDepartment of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Miłosz JaguszewskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeCardiologyMyocardial InfarctionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionHumans

Identifiers

PMID33843035
PMCPMC8078947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.