Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843027›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2021

Biomechanical and biochemical evaluation of the effect of systemic application of omeprazole on the osseointegration of titanium implants.

Samet Tekin, Serkan Dundar, Fatih Demirci, Alihan Bozoglan, Tuba Talo Yildirim, Nedim Gunes, Izzet Acikan, Erhan Cahit Ozcan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samet TekinDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey. s.tekin@firat.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-8883-8307
Serkan DundarDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Fatih DemirciDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Alihan BozoglanDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Tuba Talo YildirimDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Nedim GunesDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Izzet AcikanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sütcü Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Erhan Cahit OzcanDepartment of Plastic-Reconstructive & Esthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Fırat University · TRDicle University · TRInonu University · TRKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the effects of systemic omeprazole treatment on the osseointegration of titanium implants. MATERIAL AND

methodsAfter surgical insertion of titanium implants into the metaphyseal part of rats' both right and left tibial bones, the animals were randomly divided into three equal groups: control (n = 8), omeprazole dosage-1 (n = 8) (OME-1), and omeprazole dosage-2 (n = 8) (OME-2) and totally 48 implants were surgically integrated. The rats in the control group received no treatment during the four-week postoperative experimental period. In the OME-1 and OME-2 groups, the rats received omeprazole in doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively, every 3 days for 4 weeks. After the experimental period, the rats were euthanized. One rat died in each group and the study was completed with seven rats in each group. Blood serum was collected for biochemical analysis, and the implants and surrounding bone tissue were used for biomechanical reverse-torque analysis. In the biomechanical analysis, implants that were not properly placed and were not osseointegrated were excluded from the evaluation.

resultsOne-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test and Student's t test were used for statistical analysis. The reverse-torque test (control (n = 9), OME-1 (N = 7), and OME-2 (n = 7)) analysis of biochemical parameters (alkaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphorus, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine amino transferase, urea, and creatinine) revealed no significant differences between the groups (control (n = 7), OME-1 (N = 7), and OME-2 (n = 7)) (P > 0.05).

conclusionsOmeprazole had no biomechanical or biochemical effects on the osseointegration process of titanium implants.

Indexed as

OsseointegrationTitaniumAnimalsOmeprazoleProstheses and ImplantsRatsTibiaOmeprazoleTitaniumBone implant connectionBone implant contactOmeprazoleOsseointegrationProton pump inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33843027
PMCPMC8039067
OpenAlexW3156575425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.