Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33843007›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2021

Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?

Paula Espinosa-Olarte, Anna La Salvia, Maria C Riesco-Martinez, Beatriz Anton-Pascual, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Personalized functional profiling usingCancer biology & therapy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paula Espinosa-OlarteOncology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Imas12, UCM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-6764
Anna La SalviaOncology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Imas12, UCM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5020-8657
Maria C Riesco-MartinezOncology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Imas12, UCM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-0607
Beatriz Anton-PascualOncology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Imas12, UCM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9237-8614
Rocio Garcia-CarboneroOncology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Imas12, UCM, Madrid, Spain. rgcarbonero@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3342-397X
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a broad spectrum of tumors with widely variable biological and clinical behavior. Primary tumor site, extent of disease, tumor differentiation and expression of so matostatin receptors, proliferation and growth rates are the major prognostic factors that determine the therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for advanced disease have considerably expanded in recent years, particularly for well differentiated tumors (NETs). Novel drugs approved over the past decade in this context include somatostatin analogues and

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsHumansSomatostatinSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID33843007
PMCPMC8346445
OpenAlexW3155849252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.