ReviewHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2021
The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors.
Review in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- An analysis of the outcome of 2,443 women applying to be donors at a commercial egg bank in the USA.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Protecting the health of donor-conceived offspring.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Routes to expanded carrier screening in the UK: The perspectives of professional stakeholders.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Comparative genetic analysis of blood and semen samples in sperm donors from Hunan, China.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Stakeholders' experiences and perspectives of reproductive genetic carrier screening in gamete donation: a scoping review.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Application of clinical exome sequencing in sperm donor screening in China.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Egg donors' attitudes toward identifiability, offspring information, and genetic testing.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- Clinical exome sequencing for carrier screening in assisted reproductive technology and sperm donation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- An exploratory study of perceptions and utilization of genetic information in the intended parent experience of oocyte donor selection.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding, and registries in European countries-an update.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Israeli students' perceptions regarding sperm donation: dilemmas reflections with dominant demographic effect.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Management considerations for clinically relevant findings on expanded carrier screening in a sperm donor applicant population.F&S reports · 2023Article
- An analysis of the outcome of 11 712 men applying to be sperm donors in Denmark and the USA.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Genetic testing of sperm donors in China: a survey of current practices.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Carrier screening and PGT for an autosomal recessive monogenic disorder: insights from virtual trials.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Maintaining an adequate sperm donor pool: modifying the medical criteria for sperm donor selection.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat are the sperm and egg donor rejection rates after expanded carrier screening (ECS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Using an ECS panel looking at 46/47 genes, 17.6% of donors were rejected. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The use of ECS is becoming commonplace in assisted reproductive technology, including testing of egg and sperm donors. Most national guidelines recommend rejection of donors if they are carriers of a genetic disease. If the use of ECS increases, there will be a decline in the number of donors available. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A review of the current preconception ECS panels available to donors was carried out through an online search. The genetic testing results of donors from Cryos International were analysed to determine how many were rejected on the basis of the ECS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsData on gamete donors and their carrier status was provided by Cryos International, who screen donors using their own bespoke ECS panel. The ECS panels identified through the review were compared to the Cryos International panel and data. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 16 companies and 42 associated ECS panels were reviewed. There were a total of 2673 unique disorders covered by the panels examined, with a mean of 329 disorders screened. None of these disorders were common to all panels. Cryos International screen 46 disorders in males and 47 in females. From 883 candidate donors, 17.6% (155/883) were rejected based on their ECS result. Carriers of alpha-thalassaemia represented the largest proportion of those rejected (19.4%, 30/155), then spinal muscular atrophy (15.5%, 24/155) and cystic fibrosis (14.8%, 23/155). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Panel information was found on company websites and may not have been accurate. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThis study highlights the need for consistent EU regulations and guidelines that allow genetic matching of gamete donors to their recipients, preventing the need to reject donors who are known carriers. A larger ECS panel would be most beneficial; however, this would not be viable without matching of donors and recipients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained. J.C.H. is the founder of Global Women Connected, a platform to discuss women's health issues and the Embryology and PGD Academy, who deliver education in clinical embryology. She has been paid to give a lecture by Cryos in 2019. A-B.S. is an employee of Cryos International. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.