Differences in perceptual assimilation following training.

Heather Kabakoff, Julia Kharlamenko, Erika S Levy, Susannah V Levi

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in JASA express letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather KabakoffDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, New York 10012, USA.

Julia KharlamenkoDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, New York 10012, USA.

Erika S LevyDepartment of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA heather.kabakoff@nyu.edu, jk5096@nyu.edu, elevy@exchange.tc.columbia.edu, svlevi@nyu.edu.

Susannah V LeviDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York, New York 10012, USA.

Funding

Establishing the Role of Sensorimotor Skills in Speech Development and DisordersF31DC018197 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KABAKOFF, HEATHER M · 2019 to 2020

$55k

NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC018197

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning to perceive non-native speech sounds is difficult for adults. One method to improve perception of non-native contrasts is through a distributional learning paradigm. Three groups of native-English listeners completed a perceptual assimilation task in which they mapped French vowels onto English vowel categories: Two groups (bimodal, unimodal distribution) completed a perceptual learning task for the French /œ/-/o/ contrast and a third completed no training. Both trained groups differed from the untrained group, but participants in the bimodal group showed a different perceptual mapping for the targeted /œ/ vowel, suggesting that the bimodal condition may maximize perception of non-native contrasts.

Identifiers

PMID33842929

DOI10.1121/10.0003863

PMCPMC8020593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.