ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2021
Object discrimination performance and dynamics evaluated by inferotemporal cell population activity.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- View-invariant object representation in anterior and posterior inferotemporal cortex: A machine learning approach.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have previously reported an increase in response tolerance of inferotemporal cells around trained views. However, an inferotemporal cell usually displays different response patterns in an initial response phase immediately after the stimulus onset and in a late phase from approximately 260 ms after stimulus onset. This study aimed to understand the difference between the two time periods and their involvement in the view-invariant object recognition. Responses to object images with and without prior experience of object discrimination across views, recorded by microelectrodes, were pooled together from our previous experiments. With a machine learning algorithm, we trained to build classifiers for object discrimination. In the early phase, the performance of classifiers created based on data of responses to the object images with prior training of object discrimination across views did not significantly differ from that based on data of responses to the object images without prior experience of object discrimination across views. However, the performance was significantly better in the late phase. Furthermore, compared to the preferred stimulus image in the early phase, we found 2/3 of cells changed their preference in the late phase. For object images with prior experience of training with object discrimination across views, a significant higher percentage of cells responded in the late phase to the same objects as in the early phase, but under different views. The results demonstrate the dynamics of selectivity changes and suggest the involvement of the late phase in the view-invariant object recognition rather than that of the early phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.