ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Nomogram for predicting the survival rate of primary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma patients: a retrospective study based on SEER database.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A surgical strategy-based nomogram for primary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Endoscopic resection of bronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a young adult man: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (PMEC) is a rare malignant tumor, and the clinical manifestations lack specificity. The study evaluates the prognostic factors and constructs a practicable nomogram to estimate the individualized survival status for PMEC patients.
methodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to selected eligible patients between 1975 and 2016. The baseline characteristics including age, sex, race, marital status, tumor stage, differentiated degree, tumor laterality, primary tumor site, tumor size, lymph node metastases status, distant metastases status, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. We identified independent variables to build 3-, 5-, 10-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) nomograms by univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsA total of 438 PMEC patients met our selection criteria. In multivariate analysis, age, tumor stage, differentiated grade, tumor size, lymph node metastases status, distant metastases status, surgery and radiation were involved in the nomogram. The C-index (0.887 (95% CI: 0.863-0.911), calibrate plots and ROC curves (AUC =0.941, 0.951, 0.935 for 3-, 5-, 10-year OS, respectively) indicated the satisfied accuracy and practicability of our nomograms. Compared to TNM system, our model also showed a superior prediction (IDI =0.167, 0.171, 0.172, P<0.001).
conclusionsWe built OS (CSS) nomograms that can accurately estimate individualized survival time and identify the risk classification of PMEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.