ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
A potentially effective drug for patients with recurrent glioma: sermorelin.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mesenchymal Stem cell therapy with GHRH receptor analog resolves post-stroke vasogenic edema via modulating AQP4 and mitochondria-ER crosstalk.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Growth hormone-releasing hormone attenuates amyloid deposition and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease models.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Growth hormone-releasing hormone and cancer.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Growth hormone-releasing hormone and its analogues in health and disease.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025Review
- A longer time to relapse is associated with a larger increase in differences between paired primary and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastomas at both the transcriptomic and genomic levels.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024Article
- Agonistic analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone promotes neurofunctional recovery and neural regeneration in ischemic stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment insensitivity is the main cause of glioma. This study was designed to screen out effective drugs for recurrent gliomas based on the transcriptomics data.
methodsA total of 1,018 glioma patients with transcriptome sequencing data and clinical data were included in this study. There were 325 patients in the discovery cohort, including 229 primary patients and 92 recurrent patients. There were 693 patients in the validation cohort, including 422 primary patients and 271 relapsed patients. Drug Resistant Scores (DRS) of 4,865 drugs of each patient were used for screening. The analysis and drawing in this study were mainly based on R language.
resultsAfter high-throughput drug screening, we found that recurrent glioma patients were most sensitive to sermorelin. Further analysis revealed that sermorelin was suitable for recurrent patients with high grade, IDH-wildtype and 1p/19q non-codeletion status. GO and KEGG analyses found that sermorelin may inhibit tumor cell proliferation by cell cycle blocking. Moreover, sermorelin was also related to the immune system process and negatively regulated immune checkpoints and M0 macrophages. Lastly, the Kaplan-Meier method showed the patient's benefit from sermorelin was independent of postoperative adjuvant treatment.
conclusionsRecurrent glioma patients are sensitive to sermorelin and it makes effect through glioma cells proliferation inhibiting and immune response enhancing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.