ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells enhance the therapeutic effect of imipenem by regulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells in septic mice.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy in Preclinical Models of Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Differences in immunity and survival among non-small cell lung cancer patients: a gut microbiota perspective.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Machine learning reveals the rules governing the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells in septic preclinical models.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUmbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs), which possess potent immunomodulatory effects and low immunogenicity, are considered to be a promising stem cell-based therapy for sepsis. In the current study, we aimed to investigate whether the combined use of UC-MSCs and imipenem has a better effect than imipenem alone in treating
methodsWe randomly divided mice into five groups with 10 mice in each group: the normal control group (control group), the sepsis group (vehicle group), the MSCs treatment group (MSCs group), the imipenem treatment group (imipenem group), and the imipenem plus MSCs treatment group (imipenem + MSCs group). We monitored the survival rate in each group every 12 h for 3 days. After observing the survival rate, another 50 mice were also randomly divided into five groups, and the mice were sacrificed after 24 h. Bacterial colonies from the blood and peritoneal lavage fluid were counted in a blinded manner. Organ injury was analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Frequencies of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the blood, spleen, and bone marrow (BM) were determined by flow cytometry. Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and IL-10 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
resultsCompared with imipenem treatment, the co-administration of UC-MSCs and imipenem dramatically improved the survival rate, decreased the bacterial load, and ameliorated organ injury. Furthermore, UC-MSCs treatment, either alone or in combination with imipenem, significantly increased plasma levels of IL-10 and the percentage of MDSCs by inducing arginase-1 in septic mice.
conclusionsOur results indicated that UC-MSCs protect mice against sepsis by acting on MDSCs. Combination therapy of UC-MSCs and imipenem may be a new approach for the future clinical treatment of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.