Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33842601›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

The role of magnification correction in macular vessel density assessment: a contralateral eye study in anisometropia patients.

Dan Fu, Meiyan Li, Li Zeng, Jianmin Shang, Zhiqiang Yu, Xingtao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Interocular comparison of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and vasculature in non-pathological myopia with anisometropia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan FuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Meiyan LiEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li ZengEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianmin ShangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiqiang YuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xingtao ZhouEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvestigating the impact of magnification correction in macular vessel density using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients with anisometropia.

methodsCross-sectional study. Totally 47 patients (11 male, 36 female) aged >18 years with high myopia were analyzed. All patients underwent evaluation of visual acuity, subjective refraction, and axial length. Anisometropia (n=37) was defined as a refraction difference between paired eyes ≥0.75 D. The control group (n=10) consisted patients with a refraction difference ≤0.5 D. Superficial vessel density was performed using 3 mm × 3 mm Cirrus-HD OCTA protocol. The vessel length density (VLD) and foveal avascular zone area (FAZA) were analyzed before and after magnification correction using Bennett's formula.

resultsThe mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -10.54±3.47 D in the more myopic eye and -8.05±3.47 D in the contralateral eye (P<0.001). Before magnification correction, the mean perfusion density (PD) and VLD were both significantly lower in the more myopic eyes. After magnification correction, the VLD and PD did not differ between paired eyes. No statistical difference was found in terms of the FAZA between paired eyes regardless of magnification correction. The magnification-induced differences in both VLD and PD were positively correlated with the difference in SE (both r=0.86, P<0.001).

conclusionsIn OCTA analysis, magnification correction should be performed to reduce refraction error-induced image error, which deserves attention in the clinical application.

Indexed as

Anisometropiahigh myopiamagnification correctionoptical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)vessel density

Identifiers

PMID33842601
PMCPMC8033318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.