ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021
Metal Material, Properties and Design Methods of Porous Biomedical Scaffolds for Additive Manufacturing: A Review.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Volumetric Infiltration of Brushite and Monetite Cements into Laser Powder Bed Fusion Ti-6Al-4V Lattices: A Feasibility Study of Lattice Geometry and Cement Formulation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ion-Driven Regulation of CaAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Integrated Experimental and Computational Analysis of SLM-Fabricated Ti6Al4V Octet-Truss Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A review of 3D printed medical implant design.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- Data-driven inverse design of multifunctional bicontinuous multiscale structures.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Bioinspired functional materials for biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Influence of heating rate and soak time on microwave sintered hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate ceramics for bone applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel synthesis of AlJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Article
- Porous Structures, Surface Modifications, and Smart Technologies for Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Lattice Structures in Additive Manufacturing for Biomedical Applications: A Systematic Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Targeting diabetic foot ulcer pathophysiology: altered signaling pathways and 3D scaffold as an emerging treatment strategy.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Metallic Ion Release Behaviors from Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing with Mechanical Grinding in an Acidic Saline Solution.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polycaprolactone for Hard Tissue Regeneration: Scaffold Design and In Vivo Implications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Selective laser melting fabrication of functionally graded macro-porous Ti-6Al-4V scaffold for cavity bone defect reconstruction.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A Novel Triad of Bio-Inspired Design, Digital Fabrication, and Bio-Derived Materials for Personalised Bone Repair.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Additive manufacturing of degradable metallic scaffolds for material-structure-driven diabetic maxillofacial bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- 3D printing technology and its combination with nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
- Bone Tissue Engineering and Nanotechnology: A Promising Combination for Bone Regeneration.Biology · 2024Review
- 3D Printed SiOJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Improved cell growth on additively manufactured Ti64 substrates with varying porosity and nanofibrous coating.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design an implant similar to the human bone is one of the critical problems in bone tissue engineering. Metal porous scaffolds have good prospects in bone tissue replacement due to their matching elastic modulus, better strength, and biocompatibility. However, traditional processing methods are challenging to fabricate scaffolds with a porous structure, limiting the development of porous scaffolds. With the advancement of additive manufacturing (AM) and computer-aided technologies, the development of porous metal scaffolds also ushers in unprecedented opportunities. In recent years, many new metal materials and innovative design methods are used to fabricate porous scaffolds with excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility. This article reviews the research progress of porous metal scaffolds, and introduces the AM technologies used in porous metal scaffolds. Then the applications of different metal materials in bone scaffolds are summarized, and the advantages and limitations of various scaffold design methods are discussed. Finally, we look forward to the development prospects of AM in porous metal scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.