Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33842380›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2021

Early Life Microbiota Colonization at Six Months of Age: A Transitional Time Point.

Benedetta Raspini, Mirco Vacca, Debora Porri, Rachele De Giuseppe, Francesco Maria Calabrese, Marcello Chieppa, Marina Liso, Rosa Maria Cerbo, Elisa Civardi, Francesca Garofoli and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benedetta RaspiniDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Laboratory, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Mirco VaccaDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Debora PorriDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Laboratory, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Rachele De GiuseppeDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Laboratory, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Francesco Maria CalabreseDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Marcello ChieppaNational Institute of Gastroenterology "S. de Bellis", Institute of Research, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Marina LisoNational Institute of Gastroenterology "S. de Bellis", Institute of Research, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Rosa Maria CerboNeonatal Unit and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Elisa CivardiNeonatal Unit and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca GarofoliNeonatal Unit and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Maria De AngelisDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Hellas CenaDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Laboratory, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITGastroenterology Hospital "Saverio de Bellis" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early life gut microbiota is involved in several biological processes, particularly metabolism, immunity, and cognitive neurodevelopment. Perturbation in the infant's gut microbiota increases the risk for diseases in early and later life, highlighting the importance of understanding the connections between perinatal factors with early life microbial composition. The present research paper is aimed at exploring the prenatal and postnatal factors influencing the infant gut microbiota composition at six months of age. Methods: Gut microbiota of infants enrolled in the longitudinal, prospective, observational study "A.MA.MI" ( Results: Different clustering hypotheses have been tested to evaluate the impact of known metadata factors on the infant microbiota. Neither maternal body mass index nor gestational weight gain was able to determine significant differences in infant microbiota composition six months of age. Concerning the type of feeding, we observed a low alpha diversity in exclusive breastfed infants; conversely, non-exclusively breastfed infants reported an overgrowth of Conclusion: Our findings showed that, at this stage of life, there is not a single factor able to affect in a distinct way the infants' gut microbiota development. Rather, there seems to be a complex multifactorial interaction between maternal and neonatal factors determining a unique microbial niche in the gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaBreast FeedingFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective Studiesbreast milkdeliverymaternal factorsneonatal microbiotanewbornolder siblingsweaning

Identifiers

PMID33842380
PMCPMC8032992
OpenAlexW3147397379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.