ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Dynamic cfDNA Analysis by NGS in
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic role of circulating DNA markers in patients with lung malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of EGFR T790M mutation status following the development of Osimertinib resistance on the efficacy of Osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2024Pooled it
- EGFR-plasma mutations in prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR TKIs: A meta-analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Bridging Discovery and Treatment: Cancer Biomarker.Cancers · 2025Review
- Enhancing detection and monitoring of circulating tumor cells: Integrative approaches in liquid biopsy advances.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- A molecular dynamics protocol for rapid prediction of EGFR overactivation and its application to the rare mutations S768I, S768N, D761N.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Genetic mutation profiling reveals biomarkers for targeted therapy efficacy and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer.Heliyon · 2024Article
- High somatic mutations in circulating tumor DNA predict response of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to first-line nab-paclitaxel plus S-1: prospective study.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Monitoring of Plasma EGFR Mutations during Osimertinib Treatment for NSCLC Patients with Acquired T790M Mutation.Cancers · 2023Article
- Evaluation of circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic biomarker for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluate the Prognosis ofTechnology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCirculating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) level has been demonstrated to be associated with efficacy in first generation EGFR TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of dynamic cfDNA analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with subsequent third-generation EGFR TKIs remains unclear.
methodsFrom 2016 to 2019, 81 NSCLC patients with
resultsIn univariate analysis, the median PFS of patients with undetectable cfDNA level during treatment was significantly longer than those with detectable cfDNA (16.97
conclusionsPatients with undetectable cfDNA during the third-generation EGFR TKI treatment have superior clinical outcomes, and dynamic cfDNA analysis by NGS is valuable to explore potential resistant mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.