ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Machine Learning-Based Ultrasomics Improves the Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Atypical Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: A Systematic Review.Digestion · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning for malignant versus benign focal liver lesions on US and CEUS: a meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Pooled it
- Differentiation of focal liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasound using a heuristic-guided hybrid machine-learning framework.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- [Application and prospects of artificial intelligence from tool empowerment to paradigm reconstruction for whole-course diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases by ultrasound].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- A Clinlabomics-Based Machine Learning Model Accurately Differentiates Atypical Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Atypical Benign Focal Hepatic Lesion.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Microvascular Imaging of Hepatic Hemangiomas.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in contrast enhanced ultrasound: A new era for liver lesion assessment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Deep-learning-based washout classification for decision support in contrast-enhanced ultrasound examinations of the liver.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Enhanced diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver space-occupying lesions: superior sensitivity and specificity over conventional ultrasound.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- An artificial intelligence-based recognition model of colorectal liver metastases in intraoperative ultrasonography with improved accuracy through algorithm integration.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2025Article
- Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Imaging Diagnostics for the Management of Liver Disease-Applications and Challenges in Personalized Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence techniques in liver cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Deep learning approach for discrimination of liver lesions using nine time-phase images of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2024Article
- The Index sAGP is Valuable for Distinguishing Atypical Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Atypical Benign Focal Hepatic Lesions.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Patients with Liver Lesions: A Comparative Study with Clinicians.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Current Status and Analysis of Machine Learning in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.eGastroenterology · 2023Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence models for the diagnosis and management of liver diseases.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe typical enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) are hyper-enhanced in the arterial phase and washed out during the portal venous and late phases. However, atypical variations make a differential diagnosis both challenging and crucial. We aimed to investigate whether machine learning-based ultrasonic signatures derived from CEUS images could improve the diagnostic performance in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and atypical hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 226 focal liver lesions, including 107 aHCC and 119 FNH lesions, examined by CEUS were reviewed retrospectively. For machine learning-based ultrasomics, 3,132 features were extracted from the images of the baseline, arterial, and portal phases. An ultrasomics signature was generated by a machine learning model. The predictive model was constructed using the support vector machine method trained with the following groups: ultrasomics features, radiologist's score, and combination of ultrasomics features and radiologist's score. The diagnostic performance was explored using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsA total of 14 ultrasomics features were chosen to build an ultrasomics model, and they presented good performance in differentiating FNH and aHCC with an AUC of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80, 0.89), a sensitivity of 76.6% (95% CI: 67.5%, 84.3%), and a specificity of 80.5% (95% CI: 70.6%, 85.9%). The model trained with a combination of ultrasomics features and the radiologist's score achieved a significantly higher AUC (0.93, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.96) than that trained with the radiologist's score (AUC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.89,
conclusionsMachine learning-based ultrasomics performs as well as the staff radiologist in predicting the differential diagnosis of FNH and aHCC. Incorporating an ultrasomics signature into the radiologist's score improves the diagnostic performance in differentiating FNH and aHCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.