Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33842255›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2021

Changes of EGFR and SMC4 expressions in triple-negative breast cancer and their early diagnostic value.

Ting Huang, Jing Xiang, Yun Wang, Youlin Tuo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ting HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jing XiangDepartment of Outpatient, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yun WangDepartment of Neurology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Youlin TuoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science & Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the diagnostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and structural maintenance of chromosome protein 4 (SMC4) for triple-negative breast cancer.

methodsA total of 213 breast cancer patients were selected and divided into triple-negative breast cancer (100 cases) and non-triple-negative breast cancer (113 cases) according to the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Patient information including age, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, drinking history, menopause, tumor classification, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, clinical stage, and EGFR and SMC4 expression were collected for all subjects. Logistic regression analysis was then used to evaluate the risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer. The ROC curve was also used to evaluate the clinical value of EGFR and SMC4 in the diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer.

resultsLogistic regression analysis showed that high expression of SMC4 and high expression of EGFR were both risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.72 and 1.56, respectively (both P<0.05). ROC curve analysis results showed that the areas under the curve with high SMC4 expression and high EGFR expression for the diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer were 0.84 and 0.78, respectively.

conclusionsHigh expression of SMC4 and EGFR is significantly correlated with triple-negative breast cancer, and can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic indicator for triple-negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)structural maintenance of chromosome protein 4 (SMC4)Triple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID33842255
PMCPMC8033084
OpenAlexW3149069705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.