Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33842217›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2021

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device systems infections: current outcomes and management strategies.

Nana Aburjania, Christine M Hay, Muhammad R Sohail

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Infections in mechanical circulatory support.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A Case Report of a LVAD Driveline Infection Diagnosed by Point-of-care Ultrasound.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nana AburjaniaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Christine M HayDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Muhammad R SohailSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular assisted devices (LVADs) are increasingly used for management of patients with advanced heart failure. However, infection remains one of the most commonly reported complications. Diagnosis, as well as treatment of LVAD infections is challenging. There are multiple diagnostic modalities that have been used to assist with accurate diagnosis of LVAD infections. Treatment of the infection can be especially challenging in these patients, given the presence of the implantable device that cannot be easily replaced or removed. There are no clinical trials assessing the best approach to diagnosis, treatment or long-term management of LVAD infections. In this article we review the most recent diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches, as well as offer our guidance on diagnosis and treatment of LVAD infections.

Indexed as

infectionLeft ventricular assisted device (LVAD)managementoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID33842217
PMCPMC8033263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.