ArticleCureus2021
Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measurements on Radiograph Versus Computed Tomography at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pune, Central India.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Variations in tracheal diameter with respect to factors like age and gender are one of the major factors affecting the size of the endotracheal tube (ETT) preferred in a patient. It is important to pre-determine this figure because a tube of a larger size predisposes the patient for tracheal mucosal ischemia, while one of a smaller size may not ensure adequate oxygen saturation in the patient. Purpose We undertook this study to assess the accuracy of radiograph versus computed tomography (CT) and comment on whether a CT should be carried out mandatorily in all patients where intubation is needed. Materials and methods The study was undertaken at Dr DY Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Center, a tertiary care institute in Pune, India. A total of 217 patients in whom both chest radiograph and chest CT were performed were enrolled in the study and measurements were performed at suitable landmarks which correspond to the position of endotracheal tubes. Results The males had a mean age of 44.2 years and females of 41.7 years. The mean X-ray transverse diameter was 15.4 ± 3.2 (SD) mm, mean CT axial transverse diameter was 15.3 ± 3.4 (SD) mm, mean CT sagittal diameter was 14.8 ± 3.7 (SD) mm, and the mean CT coronal diameter was 15.2 ± 3.5(SD)mm. Conclusions There was a significant difference in mean X-ray transverse diameter (Low kV), CT axial transverse diameter, CT sagittal diameter, and CT coronal diameter between males and females. Mean values were significantly higher in males as compared to females. There was a significant difference in tracheal diameters for different age groups, irrespective of the modality. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant difference between chest radiograph and CT for tracheal diameter measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.