Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33842089›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2021

Practicing in a Pandemic: A Clinician's Guide to Remote Neurologic Care.

Christopher G Tarolli, Julia M Biernot, Peter D Creigh, Emile Moukheiber, Rachel Marie E Salas, E Ray Dorsey, Adam B Cohen

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Comparison of Patients' and Neurologists' Assessments of their Teleneurology Encounter: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher G TarolliDepartment of Neurology (CGT, PDC, ERD), University of Rochester; Center for Health + Technology (CGT, ERD), University of Rochester, NY; OSF HealthCare (JMB), Illinois Neurological Institute Memory and Dementia Care Clinic, Peoria, IL; Department of Neurology (JMB, EM, RMES, ABC), The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Health Technologies (ABC), Army Medical Response, National Health Mission Area, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL), Laurel, MD.
Julia M BiernotDepartment of Neurology (CGT, PDC, ERD), University of Rochester; Center for Health + Technology (CGT, ERD), University of Rochester, NY; OSF HealthCare (JMB), Illinois Neurological Institute Memory and Dementia Care Clinic, Peoria, IL; Department of Neurology (JMB, EM, RMES, ABC), The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Health Technologies (ABC), Army Medical Response, National Health Mission Area, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL), Laurel, MD.
Peter D CreighDepartment of Neurology (CGT, PDC, ERD), University of Rochester; Center for Health + Technology (CGT, ERD), University of Rochester, NY; OSF HealthCare (JMB), Illinois Neurological Institute Memory and Dementia Care Clinic, Peoria, IL; Department of Neurology (JMB, EM, RMES, ABC), The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Health Technologies (ABC), Army Medical Response, National Health Mission Area, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL), Laurel, MD.
Emile MoukheiberDepartment of Neurology (CGT, PDC, ERD), University of Rochester; Center for Health + Technology (CGT, ERD), University of Rochester, NY; OSF HealthCare (JMB), Illinois Neurological Institute Memory and Dementia Care Clinic, Peoria, IL; Department of Neurology (JMB, EM, RMES, ABC), The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Health Technologies (ABC), Army Medical Response, National Health Mission Area, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL), Laurel, MD.
Rachel Marie E SalasDepartment of Neurology (CGT, PDC, ERD), University of Rochester; Center for Health + Technology (CGT, ERD), University of Rochester, NY; OSF HealthCare (JMB), Illinois Neurological Institute Memory and Dementia Care Clinic, Peoria, IL; Department of Neurology (JMB, EM, RMES, ABC), The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Health Technologies (ABC), Army Medical Response, National Health Mission Area, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL), Laurel, MD.
E Ray DorseyDepartment of Neurology (CGT, PDC, ERD), University of Rochester; Center for Health + Technology (CGT, ERD), University of Rochester, NY; OSF HealthCare (JMB), Illinois Neurological Institute Memory and Dementia Care Clinic, Peoria, IL; Department of Neurology (JMB, EM, RMES, ABC), The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Health Technologies (ABC), Army Medical Response, National Health Mission Area, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL), Laurel, MD.
Adam B CohenDepartment of Neurology (CGT, PDC, ERD), University of Rochester; Center for Health + Technology (CGT, ERD), University of Rochester, NY; OSF HealthCare (JMB), Illinois Neurological Institute Memory and Dementia Care Clinic, Peoria, IL; Department of Neurology (JMB, EM, RMES, ABC), The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and Health Technologies (ABC), Army Medical Response, National Health Mission Area, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (APL), Laurel, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurologists around the country and the world are rapidly transitioning from traditional in-person visits to remote neurologic care because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Given calls and mandates for social distancing, most clinics have shuttered or are only conducting urgent and emergent visits. As a result, many neurologists are turning to teleneurology with real-time remote video-based visits with patients to provide ongoing care. Although telemedicine utilization and comfort has grown for many acute and ambulatory neurologic conditions in the past decade, remote visits and workflows remain foreign to many patients and neurologists. Here, we provide a practical framework for clinicians to orient themselves to the remote neurologic assessment, offering suggestions for clinician and patient preparation before the visit; recommendations to manage common challenges with remote neurologic care; modifications to the neurologic examination for remote performance, including subspecialty-specific considerations for a variety of neurologic conditions; and a discussion of the key limitations of remote visits. These recommendations are intended to serve as a guide for immediate implementation as neurologists transition to remote care. These will be relevant not only for practice today but also for the likely sustained expansion of teleneurology following the pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID33842089
PMCPMC8032440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.