ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2021
Shared Decision-making in Autoimmune Neurology: Making Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty.
Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- On Shared Decision-making and Informed Consent.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn this article, the author explores the use of shared decision making (SDM) in the management of the preference-sensitive condition, neural autoantibody-mediated syndromes. RECENT
findingsThe field of autoimmune neurology lacks trials and often data to support therapeutic decisions. Treatment choices need to be made acutely, lacking crucial laboratory information and with uncertainty regarding treatment response and prognosis. This lack of data does not necessitate indecision in a population where delayed treatment may lead to poor outcomes. Over the past several decades, SDM has emerged as a model of communication enabling clinicians and their patients to explore current knowledge in the context of a patient's values and goals to arrive at joint decision, even when data are lacking. SUMMARY: SDM is a tool autoimmune neurologists should use to develop individualized treatment plans based on the patient's clinical presentation contextualized within specific values and preferences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.