ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2021
Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Totally endoscopic beating-heart redo tricuspid valve replacement using a frame-preserving strategy: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Endoscopic techniques in redo mitral and tricuspid valve surgery.Journal of visualized surgery · 2026Article
- Modified Clover Technique Using Automated Suture Placement and Securing Technology in a Passive Beating Heart Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Right Coronary Anatomy and Operative Topography of the Tricuspid Valve Annulus.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Early and mid-term outcomes of tricuspid valve surgery in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation induced by atrial fibrillation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Outcomes of minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve repair and replacement through right mini-thoracotomy.JTCVS open · 2024Article
- Beyond Conventional Operations: Embracing the Era of Contemporary Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Minimal Access Tricuspid Valve Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Commentary: A new gadget for redo tricuspid surgery.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
- Minimally invasive cardiac surgery-a Fad or the Future?Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tricuspid valve disease carries a very unfavorable prognosis when medically treated. Despite that, surgical intervention is still underperformed for tricuspid valve disease due to the reported high morbidity and mortality from a sternotomy approach. This had led to a shift towards maximizing medical therapy for right ventricular failure and, as a result, a more significant delay in surgical referrals with surgical risks when patients are finally referred. Tricuspid valve patients usually have other co-morbidities resulting from their systemic venous congestion and low flow cardiac output. Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery provides less tissue injury and, as a result, less trauma during surgery. This provides a hope for both patients and treating doctors to be more open for providing this procedure with less complications. Isolated minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery is still not performed as widely as expected. This can be partly due to the adverse outcomes historically labelled to tricuspid valve surgery or by the long journey of learning the surgical team would need to commit to with a minimal access approach. In this article we will review the perioperative pathway, and outcomes of isolated minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery in the available English literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.