ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021
High serum C-reactive protein levels predict survival in patients with treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of Existing Approaches and Potential Role of Pharmacometrics in the Interpretation of Prognostic Circulating Serum Biomarkers in Advanced NSCLC.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- The Relationship Between Non-Traumatic Fat Embolism and Fat Embolism Syndrome (FES) in Patients with Cancer.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Early Detection of Glioma: Investigating Inflammatory Markers (CRP), Kidney, and Liver Function.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in lung carcinoid patients after receiving curative surgery. A multicentre study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Synchronized Glioma Insights: Trends, Blood Group Correlations, Staging Dynamics, and the Vanguard of Liquid Biopsy Advancements.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Article
- C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Prognostic assessment of C‑reactive protein and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2022Article
- Efficacy of multi-groove silicone drains in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery and their effect on C-reactive protein: a single-center experience.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies greatly depending on whether or not it can receive molecular-targeted drug treatment including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We investigated the clinical utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels measured at the time of diagnosis in EGFR-mutant and wild-type NSCLC patients who had undergone first-line therapy.
methodsSerum CRP levels were analyzed in 213 patients, of whom 89 patients had advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who underwent first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. We used Cox proportional hazards models to study the relationship between CRP and overall survival (OS). CRP cutoff values were obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsMean serum CRP level in treated NSCLC patients were not significantly different in patients with or without EGFR mutations. The optimal CRP cutoff values were 8.1 mg/L for EGFR-mutated NSCLC and 16.7 mg/L for EGFR-wild NSCLC. Based on multivariate analysis, high CRP level (EGFR-mutated, HR: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.331-4.619, P=0.004; EGFR-wild, HR: 3.625, 95% CI: 2.149-6.116, P<0.001) was a significant and independent negative prognostic factor for OS in patients with or without EGFR mutations.
conclusionsHigh CRP levels predicted a lack of response to treatment in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with or without EGFR mutations. Thus, the CRP level is a good and easy to use prognostic factor and objective indicator for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.